Loading…

Monday and non‐Monday concentrations of lifestyle‐related blood components in the Oslo Diet and Exercise Study

Urdal P, Anderssen SA, Holme I, Hjermann I, Mundal HH, Haaland A, Torjesen P (Ullevål University Hospital; Norwegian University of Sport and Physical Education; and Aker University Hospital, Oslo, Norway). Monday and non‐Monday concentrations of lifestyle‐related blood components in the Oslo Diet an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of internal medicine 1998-12, Vol.244 (6), p.507-513
Main Authors: Urdal, P., Anderssen, S. A., Holme, I., Hjermann, I., Mundal, H. H, Haaland, A., Torjesen, P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Urdal P, Anderssen SA, Holme I, Hjermann I, Mundal HH, Haaland A, Torjesen P (Ullevål University Hospital; Norwegian University of Sport and Physical Education; and Aker University Hospital, Oslo, Norway). Monday and non‐Monday concentrations of lifestyle‐related blood components in the Oslo Diet and Exercise Study. J Intern Med 1998; 244: 507–13. Objective We hypothesized that participants of intervention studies have an unfavourable lifestyle at the weekend compared with the rest of the week, thus affecting the concentrations of components in samples drawn on Mondays. Design The hypothesis was examined using data from the Oslo Diet and Exercise Study, a 2 × 2 randomized intervention trial on diet and exercise involving 209 participants. Each person chose which day of the week to attend for blood sampling, both before and after the 1 year of intervention. Main outcome measures Comparison of mean concentrations of the components measured, in samples drawn on Mondays vs. non‐Mondays, both at the start and at the end of intervention. Results At the start, nine components, from haemostasis, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, showed a difference of more than 10% between Monday and non‐Monday values, all Monday values differing from the non‐Monday values in a cardiovascularly unfavourable direction. Participants starting and ending on a Monday showed the unfavourable profile both times, and those who were examined both times on a non‐Monday showed a consistently favourable profile, whereas those who changed the day of examination at the start and end changed profile accordingly. Conclusion The lifestyle‐related components examined here showed differences between Monday and non‐Monday values, which were not due to a selection bias. We suggest they may be related to a different lifestyle at the weekend compared with ordinary working days. If such effects are not recognized and properly taken into account, they may markedly affect the outcome of intervention studies.
ISSN:0954-6820
1365-2796
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2796.1998.00395.x