A comparison of homologous developmental genes from Drosophila and Tribolium reveals major differences in length and trinucleotide repeat content

• Published in: Journal of molecular evolution 1999-11, Vol.49 (5), p.558-566
• Main Authors: Schmid, K J, Tautz, D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amino Acid Sequence; Amino Acid Substitution; Amino acids; Animals; Codon - genetics; Comparative studies; Conserved Sequence; Deoxyribonucleic acid; DNA; Drosophila melanogaster; Drosophila melanogaster - genetics; Drosophila melanogaster - growth & development; Evolution, Molecular; Evolutionary biology; Gene expression; Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental; Genes, Insect; Genes, Regulator; Insect Proteins - chemistry; Insect Proteins - genetics; Insects; Molecular Sequence Data; Population genetics; Sequence Homology, Amino Acid; Species Specificity; Tribolium - genetics; Tribolium - growth & development; Tribolium castaneum; Trinucleotide Repeats
• ISSN: 0022-2844; 1432-1432
• DOI: 10.1007/PL00006577

The flour beetle Tribolium castaneum has become an important model organism for comparative studies of insect development. Many developmentally important genes have now been cloned from both Tribolium and Drosophila and their expression characteristics were studied. We analyze here the complete coding sequences of 17 homologous gene pairs from D. melanogaster and T. castaneum, most of which encode transcription factors. We find that the Tribolium genes are on average 30% shorter than their Drosophila homologues. This appears to be due largely to the almost-complete absence of trinucleotide repeats in the coding sequences of Tribolium as well as the generally lower degree of internal repetitiveness. Clusters of polar and other amino acids such as glutamine, proline, and serine, which are often considered to be important for transcriptional activation domains in Drosophila, are almost completely absent in Tribolium. Codon usage is generally less biased in Tribolium, although we find a similar tendency for the preference of G- or C-ending codons and a higher bias in conserved subregions of the proteins as in Drosophila. Most of the aminoacid substitutions in the DNA-binding domains of the transcription factors occur at residues that do not make a specific contact to DNA, suggesting that the recognition sequences are likely to be conserved between the two species.