Loading…

Left molar approach improves laryngeal view in patients with simulated limitation of cervical movements

Background: Immobilized cervical spine, because of either diseases or stabilizing devices, poses considerable difficulties with endotracheal intubation due to poor laryngoscopic view. The left molar (LM) approach has been shown to be useful in difficult sporadic intubation cases. We evaluated effica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2008-07, Vol.52 (6), p.829-833
Main Authors: SAINI, S., BALA, R., SINGH, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Immobilized cervical spine, because of either diseases or stabilizing devices, poses considerable difficulties with endotracheal intubation due to poor laryngoscopic view. The left molar (LM) approach has been shown to be useful in difficult sporadic intubation cases. We evaluated efficacy of this approach of laryngoscopy to improve laryngeal view in patients with simulated limitation of cervical movements. Methods: Thirty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I/II, who were scheduled to undergo routine surgical procedures under general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation, were studied. A two‐piece semi‐rigid cervical collar was used to immobilize the cervical spine. Under standardized anaesthesia and neuromuscular blocking agent, conventional laryngoscopy using a curved Macintosh blade was performed and glottic view was recorded with and without optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OELM). Subsequently, in the same subjects the laryngoscope blade was withdrawn and re‐inserted through the LM approach and glottic view was recorded with and without OELM followed by tracheal intubation. Results: With the conventional approach, laryngeal view was recorded as grade II in five patients, grade III in 24 patients, and grade IV in one patient. However, with the LM approach, laryngeal view was grade I in 25 patients, grade II in five patients, and grade III or IV in none (P
ISSN:0001-5172
1399-6576
DOI:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01645.x