Semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of pertussis

The two most commonly used targets for diagnosis of pertussis by the polymerase chain reaction have been the pertussis toxin promoter and the repeated insertion sequence IS481. A comparative assessment of these primers was performed on routinely collected nasopharyngeal swabs, stored at -20 C, using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 1999-10, Vol.18 (10), p.748-750
Main Authors: MATTHEWS, R. C, GOLBANG, N, BRÜCK, W. M, OWEN, D, BAILEY, A, WESTON, V, KERR, J. R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bacterial diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Bordetella pertussis
Child
DNA - analysis
Ent and stomatologic bacterial diseases
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Immunoassays
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Infectious diseases
Medical sciences
Nasopharynx - microbiology
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Toxins
Whooping Cough - diagnosis
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-ea62e1de61fa5aecb66e0ee083954b7bed1582c8867b71ae7c130fd8acd190643
cites
container_end_page 750
container_issue 10
container_start_page 748
container_title European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases
container_volume 18
creator MATTHEWS, R. C
GOLBANG, N
BRÜCK, W. M
OWEN, D
BAILEY, A
WESTON, V
KERR, J. R
description The two most commonly used targets for diagnosis of pertussis by the polymerase chain reaction have been the pertussis toxin promoter and the repeated insertion sequence IS481. A comparative assessment of these primers was performed on routinely collected nasopharyngeal swabs, stored at -20 C, using novel semiquantitative enzyme immunoassays. Both sets of primers behaved similarly with bacterial suspensions, and the 17 culture-positive nasopharyngeal swabs were also positive with the pertussis toxin promoter primers, with one exception, which had been subject to prolonged storage. Significantly more of the 69 culture-negative swabs were positive with the pertussis toxin promoter primers (n = 36) than with the IS481 primers (n = 18). To determine the effect of inhibitors, a comparative assessment of three primer pairs against human DNA (beta-globin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was also performed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s100960050392
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69326316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69326316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-ea62e1de61fa5aecb66e0ee083954b7bed1582c8867b71ae7c130fd8acd190643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U2L1TAUBuAginO9unQrQcRd9aRpk2Ypg18w4ELdCeU0PXUytMmdnHbg-uuN3At-bNwkhDwceM8rxFMFrxSAfc3ldAagBe3qe2KnGt1Wjbb6vtiB003lbK0vxCPmGyi-s_ahuFDQdo0DsxPfPtMSbjeMa1hxDXckD2k-LpSRSfprDFFmQr-GFCXFH-VHhmXZYkJmPMopZblekxwDfo-JA8s0yQPldePyeCweTDgzPTnfe_H13dsvlx-qq0_vP16-uaq8tmatCE1NaiSjJmyR_GAMARF02rXNYAcaVdvVvuuMHaxCsl5pmMYO_ahKiEbvxcvT3ENOtxvx2i-BPc0zRkob98bp2mhl_guVhdqBgwKf_wNv0pZjCdF3tmzcmLLVvahOyOfEnGnqDzksmI-9gv5XOf1f5RT_7Dx0GxYa_9CnNgp4cQbIHucpY_SBf7u6Lhka_RNVcJev</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871006672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of pertussis</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>MATTHEWS, R. C ; GOLBANG, N ; BRÜCK, W. M ; OWEN, D ; BAILEY, A ; WESTON, V ; KERR, J. R</creator><creatorcontrib>MATTHEWS, R. C ; GOLBANG, N ; BRÜCK, W. M ; OWEN, D ; BAILEY, A ; WESTON, V ; KERR, J. R</creatorcontrib><description>The two most commonly used targets for diagnosis of pertussis by the polymerase chain reaction have been the pertussis toxin promoter and the repeated insertion sequence IS481. A comparative assessment of these primers was performed on routinely collected nasopharyngeal swabs, stored at -20 C, using novel semiquantitative enzyme immunoassays. Both sets of primers behaved similarly with bacterial suspensions, and the 17 culture-positive nasopharyngeal swabs were also positive with the pertussis toxin promoter primers, with one exception, which had been subject to prolonged storage. Significantly more of the 69 culture-negative swabs were positive with the pertussis toxin promoter primers (n = 36) than with the IS481 primers (n = 18). To determine the effect of inhibitors, a comparative assessment of three primer pairs against human DNA (beta-globin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was also performed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-9723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-4373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s100960050392</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10584906</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bordetella pertussis ; Child ; DNA - analysis ; Ent and stomatologic bacterial diseases ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Immunoassays ; Immunoenzyme Techniques ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Nasopharynx - microbiology ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Toxins ; Whooping Cough - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases, 1999-10, Vol.18 (10), p.748-750</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-ea62e1de61fa5aecb66e0ee083954b7bed1582c8867b71ae7c130fd8acd190643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1221634$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10584906$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MATTHEWS, R. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLBANG, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRÜCK, W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OWEN, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAILEY, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WESTON, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KERR, J. R</creatorcontrib><title>Semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of pertussis</title><title>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>The two most commonly used targets for diagnosis of pertussis by the polymerase chain reaction have been the pertussis toxin promoter and the repeated insertion sequence IS481. A comparative assessment of these primers was performed on routinely collected nasopharyngeal swabs, stored at -20 C, using novel semiquantitative enzyme immunoassays. Both sets of primers behaved similarly with bacterial suspensions, and the 17 culture-positive nasopharyngeal swabs were also positive with the pertussis toxin promoter primers, with one exception, which had been subject to prolonged storage. Significantly more of the 69 culture-negative swabs were positive with the pertussis toxin promoter primers (n = 36) than with the IS481 primers (n = 18). To determine the effect of inhibitors, a comparative assessment of three primer pairs against human DNA (beta-globin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was also performed.</description><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bordetella pertussis</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>DNA - analysis</subject><subject>Ent and stomatologic bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassays</subject><subject>Immunoenzyme Techniques</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nasopharynx - microbiology</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Whooping Cough - diagnosis</subject><issn>0934-9723</issn><issn>1435-4373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U2L1TAUBuAginO9unQrQcRd9aRpk2Ypg18w4ELdCeU0PXUytMmdnHbg-uuN3At-bNwkhDwceM8rxFMFrxSAfc3ldAagBe3qe2KnGt1Wjbb6vtiB003lbK0vxCPmGyi-s_ahuFDQdo0DsxPfPtMSbjeMa1hxDXckD2k-LpSRSfprDFFmQr-GFCXFH-VHhmXZYkJmPMopZblekxwDfo-JA8s0yQPldePyeCweTDgzPTnfe_H13dsvlx-qq0_vP16-uaq8tmatCE1NaiSjJmyR_GAMARF02rXNYAcaVdvVvuuMHaxCsl5pmMYO_ahKiEbvxcvT3ENOtxvx2i-BPc0zRkob98bp2mhl_guVhdqBgwKf_wNv0pZjCdF3tmzcmLLVvahOyOfEnGnqDzksmI-9gv5XOf1f5RT_7Dx0GxYa_9CnNgp4cQbIHucpY_SBf7u6Lhka_RNVcJev</recordid><startdate>19991001</startdate><enddate>19991001</enddate><creator>MATTHEWS, R. C</creator><creator>GOLBANG, N</creator><creator>BRÜCK, W. M</creator><creator>OWEN, D</creator><creator>BAILEY, A</creator><creator>WESTON, V</creator><creator>KERR, J. R</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991001</creationdate><title>Semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of pertussis</title><author>MATTHEWS, R. C ; GOLBANG, N ; BRÜCK, W. M ; OWEN, D ; BAILEY, A ; WESTON, V ; KERR, J. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-ea62e1de61fa5aecb66e0ee083954b7bed1582c8867b71ae7c130fd8acd190643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bordetella pertussis</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>DNA - analysis</topic><topic>Ent and stomatologic bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassays</topic><topic>Immunoenzyme Techniques</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nasopharynx - microbiology</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Whooping Cough - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MATTHEWS, R. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLBANG, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRÜCK, W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OWEN, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAILEY, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WESTON, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KERR, J. R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MATTHEWS, R. C</au><au>GOLBANG, N</au><au>BRÜCK, W. M</au><au>OWEN, D</au><au>BAILEY, A</au><au>WESTON, V</au><au>KERR, J. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of pertussis</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>1999-10-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>748</spage><epage>750</epage><pages>748-750</pages><issn>0934-9723</issn><eissn>1435-4373</eissn><abstract>The two most commonly used targets for diagnosis of pertussis by the polymerase chain reaction have been the pertussis toxin promoter and the repeated insertion sequence IS481. A comparative assessment of these primers was performed on routinely collected nasopharyngeal swabs, stored at -20 C, using novel semiquantitative enzyme immunoassays. Both sets of primers behaved similarly with bacterial suspensions, and the 17 culture-positive nasopharyngeal swabs were also positive with the pertussis toxin promoter primers, with one exception, which had been subject to prolonged storage. Significantly more of the 69 culture-negative swabs were positive with the pertussis toxin promoter primers (n = 36) than with the IS481 primers (n = 18). To determine the effect of inhibitors, a comparative assessment of three primer pairs against human DNA (beta-globin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was also performed.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>10584906</pmid><doi>10.1007/s100960050392</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0934-9723
ispartof European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 1999-10, Vol.18 (10), p.748-750
issn 0934-9723
1435-4373
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69326316
source Springer Link
subjects Bacterial diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Bordetella pertussis
Child
DNA - analysis
Ent and stomatologic bacterial diseases
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Immunoassays
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Infectious diseases
Medical sciences
Nasopharynx - microbiology
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Toxins
Whooping Cough - diagnosis
title Semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of pertussis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A23%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Semiquantitative%20polymerase%20chain%20reaction%20enzyme%20immunoassay%20for%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20pertussis&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology%20&%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=MATTHEWS,%20R.%20C&rft.date=1999-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=748&rft.epage=750&rft.pages=748-750&rft.issn=0934-9723&rft.eissn=1435-4373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s100960050392&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69326316%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-ea62e1de61fa5aecb66e0ee083954b7bed1582c8867b71ae7c130fd8acd190643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871006672&rft_id=info:pmid/10584906&rfr_iscdi=true