Loading…

Chlorine Dioxide and Chlorhexidine Mouthrinses Compared in a 3‐Day Plaque Accumulation Model

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the inhibiting effect of a chlorine dioxide mouthrinse as opposed to a mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine (0.20%) during 3 days of plaque accumulation. Methods: At baseline, all participants (N = 77) received a professional prophylaxis and were r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of periodontology (1970) 2008-08, Vol.79 (8), p.1395-1400
Main Authors: Paraskevas, Spiros, Rosema, Nanning A.M., Versteeg, Paula, Van der Velden, Ubele, Van der Weijden, G.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the inhibiting effect of a chlorine dioxide mouthrinse as opposed to a mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine (0.20%) during 3 days of plaque accumulation. Methods: At baseline, all participants (N = 77) received a professional prophylaxis and were randomly assigned to the test (chlorine dioxide) or (positive) control (chlorhexidine) group. On the following 3 days, both groups rinsed twice daily for 1 minute with 10 ml test or control solution. At the end of the experimental period, plaque was assessed, and the panelists filled out a questionnaire. Results: Chlorhexidine inhibited plaque growth significantly more than the mouthrinse containing chlorine dioxide (plaque index = 1.39 versus 1.96, respectively; P
ISSN:0022-3492
1943-3670
DOI:10.1902/jop.2008.070630