Loading…
Comparison of multiple dose GnRH antagonist and minidose long agonist protocols in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial
Objective To investigate the efficacy of gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH) in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Study design Ninety-six patients with poor ovarian response in previous treatment cycles were prospectively randomized into two groups. Forty-four patients...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2008-11, Vol.278 (5), p.467-472 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
To investigate the efficacy of gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH) in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.
Study design
Ninety-six patients with poor ovarian response in previous treatment cycles were prospectively randomized into two groups. Forty-four patients were stimulated with GnRH antagonist multidose protocol and 45 patients received a standard long agonist protocol. Ovarian response was evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound and hormonal parameters. Cycle characteristics and treatment outcomes were statistically compared between groups.
Results
There was significantly reduced duration of stimulation and consumption of gonadotrophins in the antagonist group when compared to the agonist group. The estradiol concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection, the number of oocytes retrieved, and the number of embryos transferred were similar for both groups. In the antagonist group, eight (18.1%) ongoing pregnancies were achieved and in the agonist group, ten (22.2%) clinical pregnancies were achieved but the difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusion
The present study was not powered to detect clinically relevant differences between two protocols in outcomes such as pregnancy rate, with confidence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0932-0067 1432-0711 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00404-008-0620-9 |