Loading…

Performance evaluation of the ADVIA Centaur® anti-HBe and HBeAg assays

Abstract Background Detection of HBeAg and anti-HBe is valuable for the evaluation and therapeutic management of hepatitis B infection. Objectives To determine the clinical performance of the newly CE-approved HBeAg and anti-HBe assays on the fully automated, random access ADVIA Centaur® immunoassay...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical virology 2008-10, Vol.43 (2), p.169-175
Main Authors: van Helden, Josef, Cornely, Carl, Dati, Francesco, Levy, H. Roma, Bal, Tricia, Seeger, Mary, Wright, Theodore, Baker, Lawrence
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Detection of HBeAg and anti-HBe is valuable for the evaluation and therapeutic management of hepatitis B infection. Objectives To determine the clinical performance of the newly CE-approved HBeAg and anti-HBe assays on the fully automated, random access ADVIA Centaur® immunoassay system. Study design Patient samples collected at two sites were used to compare the ADVIA Centaur assays to Abbott AxSYM™ assays. Consensus of discordant results was reached using Roche Elecsys® assays. Additionally, two well-characterized seroconversion panels were evaluated. Results The ADVIA Centaur HBeAg assay sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 99.5%. The ADVIA Centaur anti-HBe assay sensitivity was 100% and the resolved specificity was 98.2%. Fewer samples required retesting with the ADVIA Centaur assays than with the AxSYM. In two well-characterized seroconversion panels, the ADVIA Centaur anti-HBe assay detected anti-HBe 20–25 days earlier than the AxSYM assay; the ADVIA Centaur and AxSYM HBeAg assays detected HBe reactivity on the same day. Conclusions The ADVIA Centaur HBeAg and anti-HBe assays demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity, and thus are suitable for clinical use. Their novel algorithms require reduced retesting, suggesting these assays may be more cost effective.
ISSN:1386-6532
1873-5967
DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2008.05.008