Does visual sensitivity improve between 5 and 8 years? A study of automated visual field examination

• Published in: Vision research (Oxford) 1999-03, Vol.39 (6), p.1107-1119
• Main Authors: Tschopp, Chantal, Viviani, Paolo, Reicherts, Michael, Bullinger, André, Rudaz, Nicolas, Mermoud, Christophe, Safran, Avinoam B
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aging - physiology; Attention - physiology; Attentiveness; Automated perimetry; Biological and medical sciences; Child; Child, Preschool; Children; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Male; Psychological Tests; Regression Analysis; Sensory Thresholds - physiology; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs; Visual field examination; Visual Field Tests; Visual Perception - physiology; Visual sensitivity development
• ISSN: 0042-6989; 1878-5646
• DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00180-1

In 74 normal subjects (62 children aged 5–8 years and 12 adults), we tested the widely-held belief that visual sensitivity improves substantially during childhood. Maturation of the retino-striate pathways is generally invoked to account for age-related changes in visual sensitivity. We evaluated the extent to which attentional factors unduly emphasized the effect of age on the purely physiological mechanisms. After a specially-designed familiarization procedure, sensitivity was fully evaluated at two locations in the superior temporal field using a bracketing technique (Octopus 2000R). False-positive (FP) and false-negative (FN) catch-trials were interspersed with the sequence of stimuli. Analyses demonstrated that: (1) age affected sensitivity; and (2) the general level of attentiveness varied not only with age, but also among subjects in the same age group. We then estimated the extent to which improved visual sensitivity may reflect a concomitant evolution of vigilance. Firstly, controlled variance analyses indicated that factors for evaluating attentiveness (rate of FN responses, slope of the psychometric function at the median, and goodness of fit) were indeed much better predictors than age of the sensitivity measured. Secondly and more significantly, the grouping of subjects into homogeneous subgroups, on the basis of their attentional performance, showed that children as young as 5 years may have a visual sensitivity that is only marginally lower than that of adults.