Loading…

Lessons from 12 years of comparative risk projects

Can an analytical tool for comparing environmental risks and policy activities be used to evaluate their relative efficacy in ultimately changing the allocation of public funds? Some insight is possible through a review of comparative risk projects that have been carried out at the city, state, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annual review of public health 1999-01, Vol.20 (1), p.159-172
Main Authors: Jones, K, Klein, H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-cdeafbe7fb84adb46c0e7ee697b516d21c611f2d3a6efcccb78fc693e5fce4093
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-cdeafbe7fb84adb46c0e7ee697b516d21c611f2d3a6efcccb78fc693e5fce4093
container_end_page 172
container_issue 1
container_start_page 159
container_title Annual review of public health
container_volume 20
creator Jones, K
Klein, H
description Can an analytical tool for comparing environmental risks and policy activities be used to evaluate their relative efficacy in ultimately changing the allocation of public funds? Some insight is possible through a review of comparative risk projects that have been carried out at the city, state, and national levels, as well as among Indian tribes, over the past 12 years. The lessons from this review should apply to the field of public health. For every comparison of environmental issues, such as clean-air standards with fish consumption advisories, there is a parallel discussion of public health priorities and strategies, such as antismoking and pregnancy prevention programs, immunization programs and disease surveillance efforts, or well-baby clinics and food safety programs. Lessons from comparative risk projects and processes may offer the public health community new ways of thinking about using stakeholder assessment processes in developing public health policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.159
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69803463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69803463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-cdeafbe7fb84adb46c0e7ee697b516d21c611f2d3a6efcccb78fc693e5fce4093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-BQkK7hLnnQRXUnxBwY2uh8nkDk1NMnEmKfTfO6UFxdVdnHPuufdD6JbgjBAu73XfTx622TBV7Rp0O64zGqWMiPIEzYngIqW4ZKdojolkaS6omKGLEDYY45IKeY5mBDNBCyHmiK4gBNeHxHrXJYQmO9A-JM4mxnWD9npstpD4Jnwlg3cbMGO4RGdWtwGujnOBPp-fPpav6er95W35uEoN43xMTQ3aVpDbquC6rrg0GHIAWeaVILKmxEhCLK2ZlmCNMVVeWCNLBsIa4PGBBbo77I3F3xOEUXVNMNC2ugc3BSXLAjMuWTTe_DNu3OT7eJui8U9aSrE3PRxMxrsQPFg1-KbTfqcIVnuu6shV_XJVNEoqco3p62PFVHVQ_8keQLIf8bt65Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235229653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons from 12 years of comparative risk projects</title><source>Annual Reviews Sciences archive collection</source><creator>Jones, K ; Klein, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, K ; Klein, H</creatorcontrib><description>Can an analytical tool for comparing environmental risks and policy activities be used to evaluate their relative efficacy in ultimately changing the allocation of public funds? Some insight is possible through a review of comparative risk projects that have been carried out at the city, state, and national levels, as well as among Indian tribes, over the past 12 years. The lessons from this review should apply to the field of public health. For every comparison of environmental issues, such as clean-air standards with fish consumption advisories, there is a parallel discussion of public health priorities and strategies, such as antismoking and pregnancy prevention programs, immunization programs and disease surveillance efforts, or well-baby clinics and food safety programs. Lessons from comparative risk projects and processes may offer the public health community new ways of thinking about using stakeholder assessment processes in developing public health policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-7525</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-2093</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10352855</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AREHDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Annual Reviews, Inc</publisher><subject>Environmental Health - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Environmental risk ; Food safety ; Health policy ; Health Policy - trends ; Humans ; Immunization ; Public health ; Public Health - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Risk Assessment ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annual review of public health, 1999-01, Vol.20 (1), p.159-172</ispartof><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-cdeafbe7fb84adb46c0e7ee697b516d21c611f2d3a6efcccb78fc693e5fce4093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-cdeafbe7fb84adb46c0e7ee697b516d21c611f2d3a6efcccb78fc693e5fce4093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10352855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, H</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons from 12 years of comparative risk projects</title><title>Annual review of public health</title><addtitle>Annu Rev Public Health</addtitle><description>Can an analytical tool for comparing environmental risks and policy activities be used to evaluate their relative efficacy in ultimately changing the allocation of public funds? Some insight is possible through a review of comparative risk projects that have been carried out at the city, state, and national levels, as well as among Indian tribes, over the past 12 years. The lessons from this review should apply to the field of public health. For every comparison of environmental issues, such as clean-air standards with fish consumption advisories, there is a parallel discussion of public health priorities and strategies, such as antismoking and pregnancy prevention programs, immunization programs and disease surveillance efforts, or well-baby clinics and food safety programs. Lessons from comparative risk projects and processes may offer the public health community new ways of thinking about using stakeholder assessment processes in developing public health policy.</description><subject>Environmental Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health Policy - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0163-7525</issn><issn>1545-2093</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-BQkK7hLnnQRXUnxBwY2uh8nkDk1NMnEmKfTfO6UFxdVdnHPuufdD6JbgjBAu73XfTx622TBV7Rp0O64zGqWMiPIEzYngIqW4ZKdojolkaS6omKGLEDYY45IKeY5mBDNBCyHmiK4gBNeHxHrXJYQmO9A-JM4mxnWD9npstpD4Jnwlg3cbMGO4RGdWtwGujnOBPp-fPpav6er95W35uEoN43xMTQ3aVpDbquC6rrg0GHIAWeaVILKmxEhCLK2ZlmCNMVVeWCNLBsIa4PGBBbo77I3F3xOEUXVNMNC2ugc3BSXLAjMuWTTe_DNu3OT7eJui8U9aSrE3PRxMxrsQPFg1-KbTfqcIVnuu6shV_XJVNEoqco3p62PFVHVQ_8keQLIf8bt65Q</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Jones, K</creator><creator>Klein, H</creator><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Lessons from 12 years of comparative risk projects</title><author>Jones, K ; Klein, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-cdeafbe7fb84adb46c0e7ee697b516d21c611f2d3a6efcccb78fc693e5fce4093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Environmental Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health Policy - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Family Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health Management Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annual review of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, K</au><au>Klein, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons from 12 years of comparative risk projects</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Annu Rev Public Health</addtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>159-172</pages><issn>0163-7525</issn><eissn>1545-2093</eissn><coden>AREHDT</coden><abstract>Can an analytical tool for comparing environmental risks and policy activities be used to evaluate their relative efficacy in ultimately changing the allocation of public funds? Some insight is possible through a review of comparative risk projects that have been carried out at the city, state, and national levels, as well as among Indian tribes, over the past 12 years. The lessons from this review should apply to the field of public health. For every comparison of environmental issues, such as clean-air standards with fish consumption advisories, there is a parallel discussion of public health priorities and strategies, such as antismoking and pregnancy prevention programs, immunization programs and disease surveillance efforts, or well-baby clinics and food safety programs. Lessons from comparative risk projects and processes may offer the public health community new ways of thinking about using stakeholder assessment processes in developing public health policy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Annual Reviews, Inc</pub><pmid>10352855</pmid><doi>10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.159</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-7525
ispartof Annual review of public health, 1999-01, Vol.20 (1), p.159-172
issn 0163-7525
1545-2093
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69803463
source Annual Reviews Sciences archive collection
subjects Environmental Health - statistics & numerical data
Environmental risk
Food safety
Health policy
Health Policy - trends
Humans
Immunization
Public health
Public Health - statistics & numerical data
Risk Assessment
United States
title Lessons from 12 years of comparative risk projects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A04%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20from%2012%20years%20of%20comparative%20risk%20projects&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Jones,%20K&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=159-172&rft.issn=0163-7525&rft.eissn=1545-2093&rft.coden=AREHDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69803463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-cdeafbe7fb84adb46c0e7ee697b516d21c611f2d3a6efcccb78fc693e5fce4093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235229653&rft_id=info:pmid/10352855&rfr_iscdi=true