Loading…

A comparison of vaginal, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal, and minilaparotomy hysterectomies for enlarged myomatous uteri

Abstract Objective To compare the operative data and early postoperative outcome of vaginal hysterectomy (VH), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), and minilaparotomy hysterectomy (MiniLPT). Methods A total of 150 women who required hysterectomy for enlarged myomatous uteri were random...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2008-12, Vol.103 (3), p.227-231
Main Authors: Sesti, Francesco, Calonzi, Francesca, Ruggeri, Velia, Pietropolli, Adalgisa, Piccione, Emilio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To compare the operative data and early postoperative outcome of vaginal hysterectomy (VH), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), and minilaparotomy hysterectomy (MiniLPT). Methods A total of 150 women who required hysterectomy for enlarged myomatous uteri were randomly allocated into 3 treatment groups: VH (n = 50), LAVH (n = 50), and MiniLPT (n = 50). The primary outcome was hospital discharge time. The secondary outcomes were operative time, blood loss, paralytic ileus, postoperative pain, and intraoperative and early postoperative complications. Results Mean hospital discharge time was longest with MiniLPT, and shortest with VH ( P < 0.01). VH was the fastest operating technique, was associated with less blood loss, and resulted in shortest duration of paralytic ileus ( P < 0.01). No intraoperative complications occurred. Conclusion VH should be the preferred surgical approach in patients with enlarged myomatous uteri. When VH is not feasible, LAVH should be considered an alternative to MiniLPT. Further controlled prospective studies are required to confirm these results.
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.07.006