Loading…

Central Venous Oxygen Saturation Cannot Replace Mixed Venous Saturation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Objective It has been argued that venous oxygen saturation from a central venous catheter (ScvO2 ) could be an inexpensive alternative to mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2 ). The aim was to evaluate whether ScvO2 measurements could replace SvO2 readings after cardiac surgery and to analyze factor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2008-12, Vol.22 (6), p.853-857
Main Authors: Lorentzen, Anne-Grethe, MD, Lindskov, Christian, MD, Sloth, Erik, MD, PhD, Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective It has been argued that venous oxygen saturation from a central venous catheter (ScvO2 ) could be an inexpensive alternative to mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2 ). The aim was to evaluate whether ScvO2 measurements could replace SvO2 readings after cardiac surgery and to analyze factors influencing any differences found. Design A prospective observational study. Setting A university hospital. Participants Twenty patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. Interventions Patients were followed postoperatively with corresponding ScvO2 /SvO2 measurements. Measurements and Main Results The overall bias between ScvO2 and SvO2 was 1.9. In coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients, the bias was 0.6 compared with 6.4 in procedures involving aortic valve replacement. In situations with peripheral saturation (SAT)
ISSN:1053-0770
1532-8422
DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2008.04.004