A study comparing biopharmaceutic characteristics of four once daily controlled release diltiazem preparations

• Published in: Fundamental & clinical pharmacology 1998-01, Vol.12 (5), p.559-565
• Main Authors: Hendriks, MGC, Dogterom, P, Ebels, JT, Oosterhuis, B, Geertsema, LR, Hulot, T, Bianchetti, G, Jonkman, JHG
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Antianginal agents. Coronary vasodilator agents; Area Under Curve; Biological and medical sciences; biopharmaceutics; Calcium Channel Blockers - blood; Calcium Channel Blockers - pharmacokinetics; Cardiovascular system; controlled release; Cross-Over Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; diltiazem; Diltiazem - blood; Diltiazem - pharmacokinetics; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; plasma profiles
• ISSN: 0767-3981; 1472-8206
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1998.tb00986.x

Summary— In the present study we have compared the steady state biopharmaceutic characteristics of four diltiazem once daily controlled release capsules: Mono‐Tildiem LP 300® (300 mg), Adizem® XL (300 mg)1, Cardizem® (300 mg) and Dilacor® (240 mg). Sixteen healthy male volunteers (aged 22.9 ± 3.3 years, range 19–31 years) completed an open label, multiple oral dose, randomized, four‐period crossover study without a washout period in between. The volunteers received each diltiazem formulation once daily for four days. Trough diltiazem and metabolites plasma concentrations were determined on days 3 and 4. The 24‐h plasma concentration‐time profiles were assessed after the dose on day 4 of each period. The following steady state pharmacokinetic parameters for diltiazem were calculated: the minimum plasma concentration (cmin), the maximum plasma concentration (cmax), the time to reach that concentration (tmax), the time interval during which the plasma concentration exceeds 50% of cmax (t50), the area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC72–96) and the peak‐to‐trough fluctuation (PTF). For the metabolites of diltiazem, N‐mono‐desmethyl‐diltiazem (NDM) and desacetyldiltiazem (DAD), AUC72–96 (AUCNDM and AUCDAD) and the ratio metabolite/parent compound were calculated. Steady state was achieved on day 3. Except one, all controlled release formulations have satisfactory controlled release properties allowing once daily administration. However, significant (P < 0.05) differences were found between the pharmacokinetic characteristics which do not allow exchange of the various formulations. Concentrations well below 50 ng·mL‐1 in the morning hours were observed for Dilacor® (240 mg) and Adizem® XL (300 mg), which could be a disadvantage of these formulations as it is well‐known that ischaemic events occur at a higher rate during that part of the day. The plasma concentration profiles of NDM and DAD, the major circulating metabolites, parallel the plasma concentration profiles for the parent compound. From a clinical point of view, all treatments were well tolerated.