Synthesis, physical characterization, and biological performance of sequential homointerpenetrating polymer network sponges based on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)

• Published in: Journal of biomedical materials research 1999-12, Vol.47 (3), p.404-411
• Main Authors: Lou, Xia, Vijayasekaran, Sarojini, Chirila, Traian V., Maley, Moira A. L., Hicks, Celia R., Constable, Ian J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; artificial cornea; Artificial organs; Bioassay; Biocompatible Materials - chemical synthesis; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry; Biological and medical sciences; Biopolymers; Biosynthesis; Cells; cellular invasion; Cornea; Implants (surgical); Interpenetrating polymer networks; mechanical strength; Medical sciences; Microscopy, Electron; Optical microscopy; poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) sponges; Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate - analogs & derivatives; Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate - chemical synthesis; Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate - chemistry; pore morphology; Prostheses and Implants; Rabbits; Strength of materials; Structure-Activity Relationship; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments; Tensile Strength; Tissue
• ISSN: 0021-9304; 1097-4636
• DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19991205)47:3<404::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-F

A limitation in the use of hydrophilic poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) sponges as implantable devices is their inherently poor mechanical strength. This precludes proper surgical manipulation, especially in the eye where the size of the implant is usually small. In this study a new method was developed to produce mechanically stronger PHEMA sponges. Sequential homointerpenetrating polymer network (homo‐IPN) sponges were made by using HEMA as the precursor for generating both the first network and the successive interpenetrated networks. Following the formation of network I, the sponge was squeezed to remove the interstitial water, soaked in the second monomer (also HEMA), and squeezed again to remove the excess monomer from the pores before being subjected to the second polymerization leading to the formation of network II. Two two‐component IPN sponges (K2 and K4) with increasing HEMA content in the network II and a three‐component IPN sponge (K3) were produced, and their properties were compared to those of a homopolymer PHEMA sponge (control). Apart from elongation, the tensile properties were all significantly enhanced in the IPN sponges; the water content was the same as in the control sponge, except for sponge K4, which was lower. Light microscopy revealed similar pore morphologies of the control and IPN sponges K2 and K3, and the majority of the pores were around 25 μm. Sponge K4 displayed smaller pores of around 10 μm. Cellular invasion into the sponges was examined in vitro (incubation with 3T3 fibroblasts) and in vivo (implantation in rabbit corneas). Although the in vitro assay detected a change in the cell behavior in the early stage of invasion, which was probably due to the formation of IPNs, such changes were not reflected in the longer term in vivo experiment. There was a proper integration of sponges K2 and K3 with the corneal stroma, but much less cellular invasion and no neovascularization in sponge K4. We concluded that IPN formation is a valid method to enhance the strength of PHEMA sponges, provided that the content of HEMA in the successive networks is not too high. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 47, 404–411, 1999.