Explanation of Spin−Lattice Relaxation Rates of Spin Labels Obtained with Multifrequency Saturation Recovery EPR

• Published in: The journal of physical chemistry. A, Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory, 2005-05, Vol.109 (18), p.4049-4061
• Main Authors: Mailer, Colin, Nielsen, Robert D, Robinson, Bruce H
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy; Fatty Acids - chemistry; Spin Labels
• ISSN: 1089-5639; 1520-5215
• DOI: 10.1021/jp044671l

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) pulsed saturation recovery (pSR) measurements of spin−lattice relaxation rates have been made on nitroxide-containing fatty acids embedded in lipid bilayers by Hyde and co-workers. The data have been collected for a number of spin-labeled fatty acids at several microwave spectrometer frequencies (from 2 to 35 GHz). We compare these spin−lattice relaxation rates to those predicted by the Redfield theory incorporating several mechanisms. The dominant relaxation mechanism at low spectrometer frequencies is the electron−nuclear dipolar (END) process, with spin rotation (SR), chemical shift anisotropy (CSA), and a generalized spin diffusion (GSD) mechanism all contributing. The use of a wide range of spectrometer frequencies makes clear that the dynamics cannot be modeled adequately by rigid-body isotropic rotational motion. The dynamics of rigid-body anisotropic rotational motion is sufficient to explain the experimental relaxation rates within the experimental error. More refined models of the motion could have been considered, and our analysis does not rule them out. However, the results demonstrate that measurements at only two suitably chosen spectrometer frequencies are sufficient to distinguish anisotropic from isotropic motion. The results presented demonstrate that the principal mechanisms responsible for anisotropically driven spin−lattice relaxation are well understood in the liquids regime.