Blind comparison of traditional serotyping with three multiplex PCRs for the identification of Salmonella serotypes

• Published in: Research in microbiology 2007-03, Vol.158 (2), p.122-127
• Main Authors: Herrera-León, Silvia, Ramiro, Raquel, Arroyo, Margarita, Díez, Rosa, Usera, Miguel Angel, Echeita, Maria Aurora
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antigens, Bacterial - genetics; Bacteriology; Biological and medical sciences; DNA Primers; Flagellins; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Microbiology; Miscellaneous; Molecular serotyping; PCR; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods; Salmonella; Salmonella - classification; Sensitivity and Specificity; Serotyping; Somatic antigens; Species Specificity
• ISSN: 0923-2508; 1769-7123
• DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2006.09.009

Salmonella serotypes are defined on the basis of somatic (O) antigens which define the serogroup and flagellar (H) factor antigens, both of which are present in the cell wall of Salmonella. Most Salmonella organisms alternatively express phase-1 or phase-2 flagellar antigens encoded by fliC and fljB genes, respectively. Our group previously published two multiplex PCRs for distinguishing the most common first- and second-phase antigens. In this paper we describe a third multiplex PCR to identify the most common serogroups (O:B; O:C1; O:C2; O:D and O:E). The combination of these three PCRs enabled us to completely serotype organisms belonging to the Salmonella species. This multiplex PCR includes 10 primers. A total of 67 Salmonella strains belonging to 32 different serotypes were tested. Each strain generated one serogroup-specific fragment ranging between 162 and 615 bp. Twenty-eight strains belonging to 21 serotypes, with a serogroup different from those tested in this work, did not generate any fragments. To compare molecular serotyping with traditional serotyping, 500 strains, received according to the order of arrival in the laboratory, were serotyped using both methods. The three multiplex PCRs were able to serotype 84.6% of the tested strains. This method was found to be very helpful in our laboratory as an alternative method for typing strains causing outbreaks, and it can be used to supplement conventional serotyping, since it is also applicable to motionless and rough strains.