Loading…

Preclinical vascular damage in white postmenopausal women: the relevance of osteoprotegerin

Abstract Osteoprotegerin (OPG) has recently been implicated in human atherogenesis. Abdominal obesity represents an established risk factor for the onset and development of atherosclerotic damage. The aim of the present study was to investigate the link between OPG and abdominal fat and the relation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Metabolism, clinical and experimental clinical and experimental, 2008-03, Vol.57 (3), p.321-325
Main Authors: Siepi, Donatella, Marchesi, Simona, Vaudo, Gaetano, Lupattelli, Graziana, Bagaglia, Francesco, Pirro, Matteo, Brozzetti, Matteo, Roscini, Anna Rita, Mannarino, Elmo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Osteoprotegerin (OPG) has recently been implicated in human atherogenesis. Abdominal obesity represents an established risk factor for the onset and development of atherosclerotic damage. The aim of the present study was to investigate the link between OPG and abdominal fat and the relationship to precocious features of atherosclerotic disease such as brachial flow-mediated vasodilation (FMV) and the intima-media thickening (IMT) in 195 white postmenopausal women (age range, 43-75 years). The study population was divided into 2 groups: group 1—waist circumference 6.85 pmol/L were OPG+ . The OPG+ subjects in both had lower brachial FMV and higher carotid IMT in comparison with OPG− subjects. At the multivariate regression analysis, waist circumference, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and OPG were predictors of carotid mean IMT ( β = 0.55, P = .001; β = −0.14, P = .001; β = 0.16, P = .001; and β = 0.14, P = .05, respectively) and age, OPG, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and brachial diameter of brachial FMV ( β = −0.13, P = .05; β = −0.25, P = .001; β = −0.14, P = .024; and β = 0.48, P = .001, respectively). The conclusions are as follows: first, OPG levels did not appear to be conditioned by a risk factor such as abdominal obesity; and second, OPG levels are mainly linked to the evidence of vascular damage. On this basis, we could speculate that OPG levels may be considered not a cardiovascular risk condition but a defense against atherosclerotic progression.
ISSN:0026-0495
1532-8600
DOI:10.1016/j.metabol.2007.10.005