Loading…

Is there a benefit from intensified medical and psychological interventions in patients with functional dyspepsia not responding to conventional therapy?

SUMMARY Aim In a prospective randomized, controlled trial, to compare the long‐term outcome of intensive medical therapy (with or without cognitive‐behavioural or muscle relaxation therapy) vs. standard medical therapy in patients with refractory functional dyspepsia (FD), referred to a tertiary ref...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2007-04, Vol.25 (8), p.973-986
Main Authors: HAAG, S., SENF, W., TAGAY, S., LANGKAFEL, M., BRAUN‐LANG, U., PIETSCH, A., HEUFT, G., TALLEY, N. J., HOLTMANN, G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:SUMMARY Aim In a prospective randomized, controlled trial, to compare the long‐term outcome of intensive medical therapy (with or without cognitive‐behavioural or muscle relaxation therapy) vs. standard medical therapy in patients with refractory functional dyspepsia (FD), referred to a tertiary referral medical center. Methods A total of 100 consecutive FD patients were allocated to a standardized symptom‐oriented 4 month therapy (SMT, n = 24), intensive medical therapy (IMT, medical therapy with testing‐for and targeting‐of abnormalities of motor‐and‐sensory function, n = 28) or IMT plus psychological interventions (either progressive‐muscle relaxation (IMT‐MR, n = 20) or cognitive‐behavioural therapy (IMT‐CBT, n = 28). The symptom intensity (SI) and health‐related quality‐of‐life (HRQoL) after 12 months were prespecified primary outcome parameters. Results After 12 months, significantly greater improvement of SI occurred in patients with IMT‐all (with or without psychological interventions) compared with SMT (P 
ISSN:0269-2813
1365-2036
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03277.x