The psychology of the marathoner: Of one mind and many

The unique physiological attributes of marathoners have long been recognised, but until the pioneering research of Morgan and Pollock (1977) little was known about their psychological characteristics. Their work revealed marathoners have significantly better mental health compared with non-athletes,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sports medicine (Auckland) 2007-01, Vol.37 (4-5), p.404-407
Main Author: RAGLIN, John S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adaptation, Psychological
Applied psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Mental Health
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Running - physiology
Running - psychology
Sports
Sports. Leisure
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The unique physiological attributes of marathoners have long been recognised, but until the pioneering research of Morgan and Pollock (1977) little was known about their psychological characteristics. Their work revealed marathoners have significantly better mental health compared with non-athletes, with desirable mental health variables being most pronounced in elite competitors. It was also found that during competition, elite marathoners typically utilise a unique cognitive strategy labelled 'association', whereby they regulate pace based upon bodily sensations including pain and effort. More recent research indicates there are considerable individual differences in the psychological responses of marathoners to the stressors associated with training and competition, and in some cases negative emotions traditionally presumed to be harmful actually benefit performance. This brief review will highlight findings of psychological research involving marathoners and other endurance athletes, distinguishing between characteristics common among groups (i.e. nomothetic) with those particular to individuals (i.e. ideographic) or sub-groups of elite and non-elite competitors.
ISSN:0112-1642
1179-2035
DOI:10.2165/00007256-200737040-00034