Loading…

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 1-(4-sulfamylphenyl)-3-trifluoromethyl-5-indolyl pyrazolines as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and lipoxygenase (LOX) inhibitors

A new series of 1-(4-sulfamylphenyl)-3-trifluoromethyl-5-indolyl pyrazolines were synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 and lipoxygenase-5,12,15 enzymes. A series of 20 novel 1-(4-sulfamylphenyl)-3-trifluoromethyl-5-indolyl pyrazolines were designed, synthesized, and screened i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 2008-04, Vol.16 (7), p.3907-3916
Main Authors: Reddy, M.V. Ramana, Billa, Vinay K., Pallela, Venkat R., Mallireddigari, Muralidhar R., Boominathan, Rengasamy, Gabriel, Jerome L., Reddy, E. Premkumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A new series of 1-(4-sulfamylphenyl)-3-trifluoromethyl-5-indolyl pyrazolines were synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 and lipoxygenase-5,12,15 enzymes. A series of 20 novel 1-(4-sulfamylphenyl)-3-trifluoromethyl-5-indolyl pyrazolines were designed, synthesized, and screened in vitro for anti-inflammatory activity. These compounds were designed for evaluation as dual inhibitors of cyclooxygenases (COX-1 and COX-2) and lipoxygenases (LOX-5, LOX-12, and LOX-15) that are responsible for inflammation and pain. All pyrazoline molecules prepared are optically active and compounds that are more potent in COX-2 inhibitory activity ( 5a and 5f) were resolved by chiral column and each enantiomer was tested for cyclooxygenase inhibitory activity. Molecular modeling and comparison of molecular models of 5a enantiomers with that of celecoxib model shows that 5a (enantiomer-1) and 5a (enantiomer-2) have more hydrogen bonding interactions in the catalytic domain of COX-2 enzyme than celecoxib. Compounds 5a, 5e, and 5f showed moderate to good LOX-5 and LOX-15 inhibitory activity and this is comparable to that of celecoxib and more potent than rofecoxib.
ISSN:0968-0896
1464-3391
DOI:10.1016/j.bmc.2008.01.047