A dissociation between subjective and objective unsteadiness in primary orthostatic tremor

• Published in: Brain (London, England : 1878) England : 1878), 2001-02, Vol.124 (2), p.322-330
• Main Authors: Fung, V. S. C., Sauner, D., Day, B. L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; ANOVA = analysis of variance; balance; Biological and medical sciences; co-contraction; CoP = centre of foot pressure; Dizziness - complications; Dizziness - physiopathology; Electromyography; Female; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes); Nervous system as a whole; Neurology; OT = primary orthostatic tremor; Postural Balance; Posture; primary orthostatic tremor; proprioception; Tremor - complications; Tremor - physiopathology; Vertigo - etiology
• ISSN: 0006-8950; 1460-2156
• DOI: 10.1093/brain/124.2.322

Patients with primary orthostatic tremor (OT) experience a disabling sense of unsteadiness but rarely fall. In order to study the relationship between the development of subjective unsteadiness, objective unsteadiness and tremor, we recorded standing under four conditions (eyes open or closed, feet together or apart) in six patients with OT. Subjective unsteadiness was indicated by the patients on a four-point scale using a hand-held slider. Objective unsteadiness was assessed by measuring the path lengths of the centre of foot pressure and body motion at the level of the cervical spine. Tremor was measured by surface electromyography from leg and paraspinal muscles. OT patients were objectively more unsteady than controls. Objective unsteadiness also increased disproportionately in patients when standing with eyes closed. These findings suggest that balance control in OT is abnormal and shows increased visual dependence. Subjective unsteadiness increased from mild to severe over seconds to minutes. The increase was faster when standing with eyes closed or feet together. However, although escalating subjective unsteadiness was paralleled by an increase in leg tremor, there were no comparable changes in either paraspinal tremor or objective unsteadiness during the course of a stand. We conclude that there is a dissociation between subjective and objective unsteadiness. This implies that subjective unsteadiness does not arise simply from an awareness of increased body sway. We postulate that the sensation of unsteadiness arises from a tremulous disruption of proprioceptive afferent activity from the legs. This disturbance gives rise to increased co-contracting drive to the leg muscles in order to stiffen the joints and increase stability. Since muscle activity remains tremor-locked, the tremulous proprioceptive feedback is increased, which then further increases the sensation of unsteadiness, and so on in a vicious circle of escalating activity.