Loading…

Atelectatic children treated with intrapulmonary percussive ventilation via a face mask: Clinical trial and literature overview

Background: Persistent atelectasis in children is lacking a gold standard treatment. Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) is presented as a promising chest physiotherapy technique in the treatment of atelectasis. This study aimed to follow the evolution of atelectasis resolution with noninvas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatrics international 2007-08, Vol.49 (4), p.502-507
Main Authors: YEN HA, THI KIM, BUI, THI DUNG, TRAN, ANH TUAN, BADIN, PHILIPPE, TOUSSAINT, MICHEL, NGUYEN, ANH TUAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Persistent atelectasis in children is lacking a gold standard treatment. Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) is presented as a promising chest physiotherapy technique in the treatment of atelectasis. This study aimed to follow the evolution of atelectasis resolution with noninvasive IPV in young children and to detect eventual adverse effects. Methods: Six children were hospitalized for respiratory distress with suspicion of atelectasis. A 15 min IPV treatment was immediately started at D1 twice a day for 5 days. Children were free of any other treatment. Chest X‐Ray (CXR) was performed on the second day (D2) and was repeated 3 days later (D5). After the study, CXR were retrospectively reviewed by three specialists who had no knowledge of the clinical observations of the patients. They were asked to assess atelectasis by a score between 4 (complete collapse) and 0 (complete resolution). A clinical score on a maximum of 4 points was assessed by appetite deterioration, dyspnoea, mucus production and cough presence at D1 and D5 (1 point per symptom present). Paired t‐test compared D1 and D5 results. Results: All patients returned home after 5 days IPV. SpO2 normalized (93.2 ± 0.8 to 95.3 ± 0.8; P = 0.002) and patients all improved clinically (score, 2.8 ± 0.9 to 0.8 ± 0.6; P < 0.05). Out of four patients with radiographic evidence of atelectasis, three improved their atelectasis score. Conclusions: No side‐effect or adverse effect was observed during IPV treatments. IPV was safe and effective in atelectasis resolution in 3/4 of the cases. Patients all recovered a stable clinical state. CXR improved in 4/5 children. They were all discharged home after 5 days of IPV treatment.
ISSN:1328-8067
1442-200X
DOI:10.1111/j.1442-200X.2007.02385.x