Frontostriatal Dysfunction During Response Inhibition in Williams Syndrome

• Published in: Biological psychiatry (1969) 2007-08, Vol.62 (3), p.256-261
• Main Authors: Mobbs, Dean, Eckert, Mark A, Mills, Debra, Korenberg, Julie, Bellugi, Ursula, Galaburda, Albert M, Reiss, Allan L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Attention - physiology; Biological and medical sciences; Brain Mapping; Case-Control Studies; Discrimination Learning - physiology; Female; fMRI; Frontal Lobe - physiology; Frontal Lobe - physiopathology; Go/NoGo; Humans; Inhibition (Psychology); Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Matched-Pair Analysis; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Neostriatum - physiology; Neostriatum - physiopathology; Neural Inhibition - physiology; Neural Pathways - physiology; Neural Pathways - physiopathology; prefrontal cortex; Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychopathology. Psychiatry; Reaction Time - physiology; Reference Values; response inhibition; striatum; Williams syndrome; Williams Syndrome - physiopathology
• ISSN: 0006-3223; 1873-2402
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.041

Background Williams syndrome (WS) has provided researchers with an exciting opportunity to understand the complex interplay among genes, neurobiological and cognitive functions. However, despite a well-characterized cognitive and behavioral phenotype, little attention has been paid to the marked deficits in social and behavioral inhibition. Here we explore the neural systems that mediate response inhibition in WS. Methods We used functional MRI (fMRI) to obtain blood oxygenation level dependence (BOLD) signal maps during the performance of a Go/NoGo response inhibition task from 11 clinically and genetically diagnosed WS patients and 11 age- and gender-matched typically developing (TD) control subjects. Correlations between behavioral, neuropsychological measures, and BOLD signal were also conducted. Results Although TD control subjects showed significantly faster response times, no group differences in behavioral accuracy were observed. Compared with control subjects, WS participants demonstrated significantly reduced activity in the striatum, dorsolateral prefrontal, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortices. These findings support the hypothesis that persons with WS fail to activate critical cortical and subcortical structures involved in behavioral inhibition. Conclusions Our results provide important evidence for reduced engagement of the frontostriatal circuits in WS and provide putative biological markers for the deficits in response inhibition and the unusual social phenotype.