Loading…
Comparative interaction of α-helical and β-sheet amphiphilic isopeptides with phospholipid monolayers
The two sequential amphiphilic peptide isomers, (Leu–Lys–Lys–Leu)4 and (Leu–Lys)8, were chosen as models for α‐helical and β‐sheet peptides, respectively. In order to evaluate the contribution of the secondary structure of a peptide to its penetration into cellular membranes, interactions of these i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biopolymers 2001-07, Vol.59 (1), p.1-10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The two sequential amphiphilic peptide isomers, (Leu–Lys–Lys–Leu)4 and (Leu–Lys)8, were chosen as models for α‐helical and β‐sheet peptides, respectively. In order to evaluate the contribution of the secondary structure of a peptide to its penetration into cellular membranes, interactions of these isopeptides with L‐α‐dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine (DMPC) monolayers were studied. Both isopeptides penetrate into DMPC monolayers up to an exclusion pressure of ∼27 mN/m, but a discontinuity is observed in the penetration profile of the α‐helical (LKKL)4. The main parameters extracted from the compression isotherms of the mixed peptide/DMPC monolayers—namely, transition pressure, mean area, elasticity modulus, and energy of mixing—were analyzed. These analyses indicate that the α‐helical isomer interacts strongly with DMPC by forming a 1:32 (LKKL)4–DMPC complex. When engaged in this complex, (LKKL)4 behaves as an hydrophobic helix and has a tendency to become vertically oriented in the course of the compression process. The β‐sheet (LK)8 interacts more weakly with DMPC and no complex can be detected. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopolymers 59: 1–10, 2001 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-3525 1097-0282 |
DOI: | 10.1002/1097-0282(200107)59:1<1::AID-BIP1000>3.0.CO;2-# |