Loading…

Comparative interaction of α-helical and β-sheet amphiphilic isopeptides with phospholipid monolayers

The two sequential amphiphilic peptide isomers, (Leu–Lys–Lys–Leu)4 and (Leu–Lys)8, were chosen as models for α‐helical and β‐sheet peptides, respectively. In order to evaluate the contribution of the secondary structure of a peptide to its penetration into cellular membranes, interactions of these i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biopolymers 2001-07, Vol.59 (1), p.1-10
Main Authors: Maget-Dana, Régine, Lelièvre, Dominique
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The two sequential amphiphilic peptide isomers, (Leu–Lys–Lys–Leu)4 and (Leu–Lys)8, were chosen as models for α‐helical and β‐sheet peptides, respectively. In order to evaluate the contribution of the secondary structure of a peptide to its penetration into cellular membranes, interactions of these isopeptides with L‐α‐dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine (DMPC) monolayers were studied. Both isopeptides penetrate into DMPC monolayers up to an exclusion pressure of ∼27 mN/m, but a discontinuity is observed in the penetration profile of the α‐helical (LKKL)4. The main parameters extracted from the compression isotherms of the mixed peptide/DMPC monolayers—namely, transition pressure, mean area, elasticity modulus, and energy of mixing—were analyzed. These analyses indicate that the α‐helical isomer interacts strongly with DMPC by forming a 1:32 (LKKL)4–DMPC complex. When engaged in this complex, (LKKL)4 behaves as an hydrophobic helix and has a tendency to become vertically oriented in the course of the compression process. The β‐sheet (LK)8 interacts more weakly with DMPC and no complex can be detected. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopolymers 59: 1–10, 2001
ISSN:0006-3525
1097-0282
DOI:10.1002/1097-0282(200107)59:1<1::AID-BIP1000>3.0.CO;2-#