Loading…

Effect of the Atrial Blanking Time On the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Dual Chamber Pacing

NOWAK, B., et al.: Effect of the Atrial Blanking Time On the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Dual Chamber Pacing. Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and dual chamber pacemakers frequently have short postventricular atrial blanking times and sensitive atrial sensing thresholds use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2001-04, Vol.24 (4), p.496-499
Main Authors: NOWAK, BERND, KRACKER, STEFAN, RIPPIN, GERD, HORSTICK, GEORG, VINCENT, ALPHONS, GEIL, STEPHANIE, HIMMRICH, EWALD, MEYER, JÜRGEN
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:NOWAK, B., et al.: Effect of the Atrial Blanking Time On the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Dual Chamber Pacing. Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and dual chamber pacemakers frequently have short postventricular atrial blanking times and sensitive atrial sensing thresholds used to provide reliable detection and mode switching during AF. However, short atrial blanking times increase the risk of atrial sensing of ventricular far‐field signals. We evaluated if the length of the atrial blanking time influences the detection of AF. The study included ten patients with a VDDR (n = 7) or DDDR system (n = 3), who presented with AF at 18 follow‐up visits. Bipolar atrial sensing was programmed to the most sensitive value. Atrial blanking times were programmed from 100 to 200 ms in 25‐ms steps in each patient. Using marker annotation, the following parameters were measured at ten consecutive ventricular beats: VAF = the interval between ventricular stimulus and first sensing of AF; AFS = the number of atrial‐sensed events between two ventricular events; and XAF = the interpolated number of atrial‐sensed events during atrial blanking time. The intervals between ventricular events and between atrial‐sensed event markers showed no significant differences for the five blanking times tested. There was no significant influence of the atrial blanking time onto the measured parameters (least square means ± standard error) with VAF between 281 ± 12 and 300 ± 12 ms (P = NS), AFs between 3.4 ± 0.2 and 3.6 ± 0.2 beats (P = NS) and XAF between 1.84 ± 0.12 and 2.03 ± 0.12 beats (P = NS). At ventricular rates < 100/min, the atrial sensing of AF in dual chamber pacemakers demonstrated no evidence for deterioration by an increase of the atrial blanking time from 100 to 200 ms. Thus, the risk of ventricular far‐field sensing may be reduced without compromising atrial sensing.
ISSN:0147-8389
1540-8159
DOI:10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00496.x