Loading…
In vitro activity of ABT-773 versus macrolides and quinolones against resistant respiratory tract pathogens
ABT-773, a novel ketolide, was compared to erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and gemifloxacin against antibiotic-resistant strains recently isolated from patients with respiratory tract infections. MICs were determined by...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 2001-05, Vol.40 (1), p.35-40 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABT-773, a novel ketolide, was compared to erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and gemifloxacin against antibiotic-resistant strains recently isolated from patients with respiratory tract infections. MICs were determined by agar dilution using standard NCCLS methodology. ABT-773 (MIC
90 0.06 mg/L) was more active than the macrolides (MIC
90 ≥ 2 mg/L) and fluoroquinolones (MIC
90 ≥ 0.5 mg/L) against penicillin-resistant
Streptococcus pneumoniae. The fluoroquinolones were the most active agents tested against β-lactamase-positive
Haemophilus influenzae (MIC
90 ≤ 0.01–0.06 mg/L), against which ABT-773 (MIC
90 4 mg/L) was comparable to azithromycin and two- and four-fold more active than erythromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. Against β-lactamase positive
Moraxella catarrhalis, the activity of ABT-773 (MIC
90 0.06 mg/L) was comparable to gemifloxacin, trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (MIC
90 0.03–0.06 mg/L) and 4- to eightfold greater than that of clarithromycin, gatifloxacin, and erythromycin. These data suggest ABT-773 could be a valuable compound for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, including those resistant to usual oral therapy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0732-8893 1879-0070 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0732-8893(01)00249-8 |