Successful Periodontal Maintenance of a Case With Papillon‐Lefévre Syndrome: 12‐Year Follow‐Up and Review of the Literature

• Published in: Journal of periodontology (1970) 2001-06, Vol.72 (6), p.824-830
• Main Authors: Wiebe, Colin B., Häkkinen, Lari, Putnins, Edward E., Walsh, Priscilla, Larjava, Hannu S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use; Dental Plaque - prevention & control; Dentistry; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Mouthwashes - therapeutic use; Oral Hygiene; Papillon-Lefevre Disease - complications; Papillon‐Lefévre disease; Patient Education as Topic; Periodontal Diseases - prevention & control; Periodontal Pocket - prevention & control; Tooth Eruption; Tooth Extraction; tooth, deciduous; Tooth, Deciduous - surgery
• ISSN: 0022-3492; 1943-3670
• DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.6.824

Background: Various approaches to treating the periodontal condition associated with Papillon‐Lefévre syndrome have been reported. These include oral hygiene instruction, use of mouthrinses, frequent debridement, multiple antibiotic regimens, periodontal surgery, extraction of hopeless teeth, and extraction of all deciduous teeth. Because Papillon‐Lefévre syndrome is rare, most publications are case reports, and very few document long‐term successful treatment of the periodontal condition. Methods: In 1986, a 3.5‐year‐old Indo‐Canadian male was diagnosed with Papillon‐Lefévre syndrome and began periodontal treatment. Initial therapy consisted of debridement every 3 weeks, a 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse, 2 regimens of metronidazole, and oral hygiene instruction for his parents. After 10 months it became apparent that the treatment was having little beneficial effect, since the periodontal destruction continued and teeth 51 and 61 exfoliated. At age 4, all remaining deciduous teeth were extracted and complete dentures inserted for the following 2‐year edentulous period; then a 3‐month maintenance schedule was maintained. Results: The patient is now 17 years old and all his adult teeth are present with the exception of the third molars. His oral hygiene varies between moderate and good, with his most recent plaque score at 80% effectiveness. There are no probing depths greater than 4 mm, with the exception of the distal of the lower second molars where opercula are present. Conclusions: Extraction of all the deciduous teeth followed by a period of edentulousness may partially explain the fact that there has been no recurrent attachment loss in the permanent teeth up to age 17. Other explanations are discussed as part of the literature review of Papillon‐Lefévre syndrome. J Periodontol 2001;72:824‐830.