Loading…
Reducing likelihood of instrumental delivery with epidural anaesthesia
Two conclusions follow from these results. First, women should be made aware of the increased risk of an instrumental delivery with a traditional epidural since such information would enable them to make informed choices about alternatives. Second, techniques that can reduce the frequency of this ad...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2001-07, Vol.358 (9275), p.2-2 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Two conclusions follow from these results. First, women should be made aware of the increased risk of an instrumental delivery with a traditional epidural since such information would enable them to make informed choices about alternatives. Second, techniques that can reduce the frequency of this adverse effect should be evaluated. One technique is a combined spinal epidural (CSE), which consists of intrathecal opioid with or without local anaesthetic, followed by intermittent local anaesthetic and opioid in the epidural space. Another epidural method is a continuous low-dose infusion (LDI) of opioid and local anaesthetic. Since motor power is often retained with these techniques, they are sometimes referred to as "mobile" or "walking" epidurals. Their use could reduce the need for instrumental delivery by permitting more mobility in labour and by enabling women to push better. The effect of these techniques on obstetric and fetal outcomes are reported by the Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) investigators in today's Lancet. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05295-8 |