Loading…

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: Long-term follow-up

Background: Recurrent small bowel obstruction caused by postoperative adhesions has traditionally been treated by conventional laparotomy, but laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction has been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy and clinical outcome o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2001-10, Vol.54 (4), p.476-479
Main Authors: Sato, Yoshiaki, Ido, Kenichi, Kumagai, Machio, Isoda, Norio, Hozumi, Masanori, Nagamine, Nobuhiko, Ono, Kazunori, Shibusawa, Hiroyuki, Togashi, Kazutomo, Sugano, Kentaro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Recurrent small bowel obstruction caused by postoperative adhesions has traditionally been treated by conventional laparotomy, but laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction has been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy and clinical outcome of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction. Methods: After conservative treatment, elective laparoscopic treatment was attempted in 17 patients hospitalized for recurrent small bowel obstruction after abdominal or pelvic surgery. Results: Postoperative adhesions were identified laparoscopically in all patients. Laparoscopic treatment was possible in 14 patients (82.4%). Conversion to laparotomy was required for 3 patients (17.6%) because of intestinal perforation (n = 1) or a convoluted mass of adherent bowel (n = 2). Long-term follow-up was possible in 16 patients. Two recurrences of small bowel obstructions were noted over a mean follow-up period of 61.7 months. Conclusions: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent small bowel obstruction. Conversion to laparotomy should be considered in patients with dense adhesions. (Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:476-9.)
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1067/mge.2001.117760