Loading…

Limited clinical utility of blood and urine cultures in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis during pregnancy

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of urine and blood cultures in the clinical management of pregnant women with acute pyelonephritis. Study Design: Data were pooled from three randomized controlled trials that were conducted at two university-based tertiary care cente...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2000-06, Vol.182 (6), p.1437-1441
Main Authors: Wing, Deborah A., Park, Alane S., DeBuque, Laurie, Millar, Lynnae K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of urine and blood cultures in the clinical management of pregnant women with acute pyelonephritis. Study Design: Data were pooled from three randomized controlled trials that were conducted at two university-based tertiary care centers and included 391 pregnant women with pyelonephritis. The results of urine and blood cultures were correlated with clinical management decisions, outcome, length of hospital stay, and cost. Results: Results of 98% of urine cultures (382/391) and 99% of blood cultures (388/391) were available for analysis. The most common pathogen isolated was Escherichia coli, which was found in 79% of the urine cultures (300/382) and in 77% of the blood cultures (27/35). Susceptibility testing revealed 46% resistance to ampicillin; 7%, 2%, and 0% resistances to first-, second-, and third-generation cephalosporins, respectively; and 1% resistance to gentamicin. Six percent of the participants (25/391) required changes in antibiotic therapy, most commonly for persistent fever (6/25, 25%). Positive blood culture results directly influenced management by prolonging the duration of hospitalization, with means of 4.6 ± 2.6 hospital days for women with bacteremia and 2.6 ± 1.5 hospital days for women without bacteremia (P
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1067/mob.2000.106135