Loading…

Ten-year follow-up of a proximal circumferential porous-coated femoral prosthesis: radiographic evaluation and stability

We studied the radiographic findings on 48 hips in 48 patients to determine the stability of a proximal circumferential porous-coated femoral prosthesis in cementless total hip replacement. The patients had coxarthrosis related to acetabular dysplasia. The follow-up interval in the study was 10 to 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2002-01, Vol.7 (1), p.68-73
Main Authors: Takatori, Yoshio, Nagai, Ichiro, Moro, Toru, Kuruta, Yoshihiro, Karita, Tatsuro, Mabuchi, Akihiko, Ninomiya, Setsuo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We studied the radiographic findings on 48 hips in 48 patients to determine the stability of a proximal circumferential porous-coated femoral prosthesis in cementless total hip replacement. The patients had coxarthrosis related to acetabular dysplasia. The follow-up interval in the study was 10 to 13 years. In 36 patients, migration of the femoral component was equal to or less than 2mm. No patient showed progressive migration. Revision surgery was performed in 37 patients because of migration of the acetabular components. Intraoperatively, no femoral components demonstrated visible motion under stress of the implant–bone interface, and none had been revised. During the follow-up period, two patients had mild thigh pain. Two others sustained fracture of the femur 11 years after surgery due to a fall. Pedestal formation was observed in 39 patients and calcar rounding in 21. The mean diameter of the medullary cavity around the distal part of the prosthesis increased from 13.6 to 16.3mm average. We conclude that the proximal circumferential porous-coated femoral prosthesis is stable for more than ten years after surgery. The risk of subsequent periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients, however, is a matter of concern.
ISSN:0949-2658
1436-2023
DOI:10.1007/s776-002-8420-1