Loading…

A QSAR analysis to explain the analgesic properties of Aconitum alkaloids

Aconitum roots are traditionally prescribed for the management of different types of painful affections in Asiatic countries. A quantitative structure‐activity relationship (QSAR) analysis was performed to study the effect of chemical substitutes in the analgesic potency of alkaloids available in Ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fundamental & clinical pharmacology 2003-10, Vol.17 (5), p.575-580
Main Authors: Bello-Ramírez, Angélica M., Buendía-Orozco, Jacob, Nava-Ocampo, Alejandro A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aconitum roots are traditionally prescribed for the management of different types of painful affections in Asiatic countries. A quantitative structure‐activity relationship (QSAR) analysis was performed to study the effect of chemical substitutes in the analgesic potency of alkaloids available in Chinese Aconitum roots. Using the CAChe program package for biomolecules, molecular modelling was performed in 12 alkaloids previously tested in a model of acetic acid‐induced writhing in rats. The ED50 (μmol/kg) was used as the activity parameter. Structural parameters were compared between alkaloids with an aroyl/aroyloxy group at R14 and alkaloids with the aroyloxy group at R4. Single linear regression analyses were performed in order to find the parameters explaining activity. Alkaloids with an aroyl/aroyloxy group at R14 exhibited the highest potency (significantly less ED50). The stability parameters were different between groups, e.g. total energy was −8.0 ± 0.4 in the potent analgesic alkaloids and −6.7 ± 0.3 in the weak analgesic alkaloids (P = 0.001). The reactivity index of C2′, C3′ and C5′ of the aromatic ring was also different between groups, e.g. the reactivity index of C5′ was 40.8 ± 0.6 in potent analgesic alkaloids and 48.1 ± 0.6 in weaker analgesic alkaloids (P 
ISSN:0767-3981
1472-8206
DOI:10.1046/j.1472-8206.2003.00189.x