Loading…
Brief report: validation of a system for automated measurement of knee laxity
Objective. To determine the accuracy and repeatability of an automated quantitative fluoroscopic imaging system for measuring knee laxity. Design. Cadaveric validation study. Background. Current methods of measuring anterior–posterior laxity lack sufficient accuracy and repeatability. A commercially...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2004-03, Vol.19 (3), p.308-312 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective. To determine the accuracy and repeatability of an automated quantitative fluoroscopic imaging system for measuring knee laxity.
Design. Cadaveric validation study.
Background. Current methods of measuring anterior–posterior laxity lack sufficient accuracy and repeatability. A commercially developed fluoroscopic software package, capable of measuring laxity, required validation.
Methods. Five human cadaveric knees were used. A constant force of 130 N was applied anteriorly and posteriorly in turn to the tibia of each knee with the femur fixed in 30° and 90° of flexion. Quantitative fluoroscopic measurements of anterior–posterior laxity were determined using image analysis software. Fluoroscopic results were compared to the true anterior–posterior displacements of the tibia, which were simultaneously recorded using linear transducers directly attached to the cadaveric specimens.
Results. The quantitative fluoroscopic method underestimated laxity by an average of 0.40 mm with a root mean square error of 0.49 mm. The 95% confidence intervals for anterior and posterior laxity error were calculated to be −0.99 to 0.25 mm and −0.89 to 0.03 mm, respectively, where a negative error represents an underestimation.
Conclusions. The quantitative fluoroscopic method offers a dramatic improvement in accuracy over current laxity measurement techniques and acceptable repeatability for assessing ligament damage.
RelevanceThe considerably more accurate, validated measurement system of this study could improve ligament assessment and diagnosis, and the recognition of injuries otherwise undetected with current methods. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-0033 1879-1271 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.004 |