Separation of alveolar surfactant into subtypes : A comparison of methods

• Published in: American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2000-08, Vol.162 (2), p.617-622
• Main Authors: GROSS, N. J, KELLAM, M, YOUNG, J, KRISHNASAMY, S, DHAND, R
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Blood Proteins - analysis; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid - chemistry; Centrifugation - methods; Female; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Medical sciences; Mice; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques; Phospholipids - analysis; Pulmonary Surfactants - chemistry; Respiratory system
• ISSN: 1073-449X; 1535-4970
• DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9908081

Alveolar surfactant is known to exist in several morphologic forms or subtypes which have been separated from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) by two types of methods-differential centrifugation (DC) and equilibrium buoyant density gradient centrifugation (EBDC). DC separates BAL into large aggregates (LA) and small aggregates (SA); EBDC separates BAL into three peaks called ultraheavy (UH), heavy (H), and light (L). We compared these two separation methods by subjecting replicates of the same pools of BALF from groups of mice to DC and EBDC in parallel assays. We found that each method was highly internally consistent, but that the amount of phospholipid in the LA fraction of DC was consistently and substantially less (by 33 to 43%) than that found in the UH + H fractions of EBDC. This appeared to be due to failure of DC to sediment all of the phospholipid that banded as UH or H in EBDC despite adjustments in the time and g-force of DC. In experiments where differentially labeled purified H and L subtypes were subjected to DC over a wide range of g-force and time conditions, cross-contamination of the DC pellet and supernatant with heterologous subtypes was always present (4 to 33% cross-contamination). Addition of extraneous serum proteins to the BAL, as a model of lung damage, resulted in further inconsistencies in DC but not EBDC. Investigators may wish to bear these considerations in mind when planning or interpreting the results of experiments bearing on surfactant subtype analysis.