Validation of the ejection fraction-velocity ratio: a new simplified “function-corrected” index for assessing aortic stenosis severity

• Published in: The American journal of cardiology 2000-08, Vol.86 (4), p.427-433
• Main Authors: Antonini-Canterin, Francesco, Pavan, Daniela, Burelli, Claudio, Cassin, Matteo, Cervesato, Eugenio, Nicolosi, Gian Luigi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abnormalities; Accuracy; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve; Aortic Valve Stenosis - classification; Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging; Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology; Biological and medical sciences; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiology; Cardiology. Vascular system; Catheterization; Conduction; Continuity equation; Coronary vessels; Echocardiography, Doppler; Ejection fraction; Electrocardiography; Endocardial and cardiac valvular diseases; Evaluation; Female; Flow velocity; Heart; Heart diseases; Humans; Intubation; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - complications; Patients; Prospective Studies; Sensitivity; Sensitivity and Specificity; Severity of Illness Index; Stenosis; Stroke Volume; Ventricle
• ISSN: 0002-9149; 1879-1913
• DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)00959-0

A new echocardiographic method for the evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) severity has recently been introduced: the fractional shortening-velocity ratio (FSVR = fractional shortening/4 Vmax2). An important advantage of the method is the possibility of avoiding the difficulties related to the measurement of left ventricular outflow tract in calcific AS for assessing the continuity equation. FSVR, however, also shows some significant limitations especially in patients with regional wall motion abnormalities and conduction defects. To overcome this problem, we developed a new index: the ejection fraction-velocity ratio (EFVR = ejection fraction/4 Vmax2), where percent ejection fraction and Vmax have been obtained with an apical echocardiographic approach. In 343 consecutive patients with AS, aortic valve area was measured by cardiac catheterization (Gorlin), whereas FSVR and EFVR were calculated by echo-Doppler examination performed within 24 hours. Mean valve area was 0.70 ± 0.30 cm2, mean EFVR was 0.78 ± 0.41, and mean FSVR was 0.45 ± 0.26. The linear correlation area-EFVR was highly significant (r = 0.88). Correlation valve area-FSVR was also significant (r = 0.82). EFVR allowed identification of patients with severe AS (area ≤0.8 cm2) with good sensitivity (88%) and specificity (85%), whereas FSVR demonstrated sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 73%. Thus, the EFVR, a very simple and not time-consuming index, is strongly related to aortic valve area in patients with AS. It allows identification of patients with severe AS with good sensitivity and specificity (better than FSVR). The EFVR, taking into consideration both ejection fraction and transvalvular pressure gradient, may be very useful in the evaluation of patients with AS and left ventricular dysfunction.