Trunk Position Influences Vestibular Responses of Fastigial Nucleus Neurons in the Alert Monkey

• Published in: Journal of neurophysiology 2004-05, Vol.91 (5), p.2090-2100
• Main Authors: Kleine, J. F, Guan, Y, Kipiani, E, Glonti, L, Hoshi, M, Buttner, U
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Cerebellar Nuclei - cytology; Cerebellar Nuclei - physiology; Electric Stimulation; Electrodes, Implanted; Functional Laterality - physiology; Head Movements - physiology; Macaca mulatta; Neck - physiology; Neurons - physiology; Orientation - physiology; Physical Stimulation; Posture - physiology; Rotation; Thorax - physiology; Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology
• ISSN: 0022-3077; 1522-1598
• DOI: 10.1152/jn.00849.2003

Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilian University, D 81377 Munich, Germany Submitted 2 September 2003; accepted in final form 14 November 2003 Vestibulospinal reflexes play an important role for body stabilization during locomotion and for postural control. For an appropriate distribution of vestibular signals to spinal motoneurons, the orientation of the body relative to the head needs to be taken into account. For different trunk positions, identical vestibular stimuli must activate different sets of muscles to ensure body stabilization. Because the cerebellar vermis and the underlying fastigial nucleus (FN) might be involved in this task, vestibular neurons in the rostral FN of alert rhesus monkeys were recorded during sinusoidal vestibular stimulation (0.1–1.0 Hz) in the roll and pitch planes at different trunk-re-head positions (center and ±45°). From the sensitivity and phase values measured in these planes, the response properties in the intermediate planes and the stimulus orientation eliciting the optimal response [response vector orientation (RVO)] were calculated. In most neurons, the RVOs rotated systematically with respect to the head, when trunk-re-head position was altered, so that they tended to maintain their orientation with respect to the trunk. Sensitivity and phase at the RVO were not affected. This pattern was the same for neurons in the right and left FN and independent of stimulus frequency. The average sensitivity of this partially compensatory RVO shift in response to trunk-re-head displacements, evaluated by linear regression analyses, was 0.59°/° ( n = 73 neurons). These data show that FN neurons may encode vestibular information in a coordinate system that is closer to a trunk-centered than to a head-centered reference frame. They indicate an important role of this nucleus in motor programs related to posture and gait control. Address for reprint requests and additional correspondence: J. F. Kleine, Neurologische Klinik, Klinikum Gro hadern, Marchioninistr. 15, D 81377 München, Germany (E-mail: jkleine{at}brain.nefo.med.uni-muenchen.de ).