Quantitative ultrasound of bone in male osteoporosis

• Published in: Osteoporosis international 2002-05, Vol.13 (5), p.388-393
• Main Authors: MULLEMAN, D, LEGROUX-GEROT, I, DUQUESNOY, B, MARCHANDISE, X, DELCAMBRE, B, CORTET, B
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon - methods; Biological and medical sciences; Biomechanics; Bone density; Bone Density - physiology; Case-Control Studies; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Fractures; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Linear Models; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Miscellaneous. Technology; Odds Ratio; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging; Osteoporosis - physiopathology; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Trauma; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonic investigative techniques; Ultrasonography
• ISSN: 0937-941X; 1433-2965
• DOI: 10.1007/s001980200044

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurement, a different approach to bone fragility assessment, has already been attempted in women with osteoporosis but rarely in men. In order to test its value and ability to identify osteoporotic men, a case-control prospective study was conducted using the Lunar Achilles, a device that measures attenuation and velocity parameters. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and stiffness index (SI), a composite parameter, were assessed through the heel of 66 osteoporotic patients, and compared with the results in 35 controls. Patients had sustained a low-trauma fracture and/or had a lumbar and/or femoral bone mineral density (BMD) more than 2.5 SD below the young male reference value. As expected, all QUS parameters were statistically lower in patients, as were the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements at the hip and lumbar spine. The two methods were compared for their ability to predict the risk of osteoporotic fractures. The odds ratios (ORs), with their 95% confidence limits, for fractures per 1 SD decrease were significant, especially for SOS and SI (OR = 2.3 [1.4-3.6] and 2.1 [1.3-3.3] respectively) and to a lesser extent for BUA (1.6 [1.0-2.4]). Our study suggests that QUS is associated with a history of low-trauma fracture in men; sensitivity is, however, less than when results are compared with BMD measurements (OR = 2.8 [1.6-5.0] and 3.4 [1.6-7.0] for lumbar spine and hip, respectively). Prospective studies are required before QUS can be recommended for clinical use in male osteoporosis.