Comparative analysis of pregnancy rates after the transfer of early dividing embryos versus slower dividing embryos

• Published in: Human reproduction (Oxford) 2004-05, Vol.19 (5), p.1155-1162
• Main Authors: Windt, M.‐L., Kruger, T.F., Coetzee, K., Lombard, C.J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 2‐cell stage embryos/early dividing embryos/ICSI/pregnancy/tubal embryo transfer; Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Cleavage Stage, Ovum - cytology; Embryo Transfer; Embryo, Mammalian - cytology; Embryology: invertebrates and vertebrates. Teratology; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Rate; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 0268-1161; 1460-2350; 1460-2350
• DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh208

BACKGROUND: We compared retrospectively the pregnancy outcome in two subgroups of ICSI patients, using early division (26 h post injection) to the 2‐cell stage as a criterion for embryo quality and viability (ability to produce a pregnancy). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the early dividing embryo (EDE) group, at least one of the transferred embryos was early dividing. In the late dividing embryo (LDE) group, no early dividing embryo was transferred. Additionally, tubal and uterine transfer in the two groups was also evaluated. Clinical pregnancy rates in the EDE group were significantly increased when compared with that in the LDE group (41.3 versus 20.0%). This was also true for ongoing pregnancy rates (33.3 versus 16.3%). The tubal transfer route showed increased (but not significant) ongoing pregnancy rates when compared with uterine transfer in both EDE (38.5 versus 25.0%) and LDE (22.7 versus 8.3%) groups respectively. In uterine transfer cycles, however, clinical pregnancy rates for EDE were significantly increased compared to LDE (37.5 and 11.1% respectively). The baby rate (number of live babies/embryos transferred) was also significantly increased in the EDE group and the tubal transfer group. Statistical analysis of pregnancy outcome, adjusted for the total number of embryos transferred (expressed as percentage risk difference – %RD), resulted significantly in favour of EDE compared to LDE (RD = 18%, P = 0.02). When adjusted for the combined factors: total number of embryos transferred, EDE and LDE, the pregnancy outcome result was significantly in favour of tubal transfer compared to uterine transfer (RD = 15%, P = 0.05). Pregnancy results of the LDE group only were significantly better in the tube compared to the uterus (RD = 19%, P = 0.04) but not significantly so for the EDE group (RD = 10%, P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: Early division is associated with embryo quality and a very easy and successful embryo transfer selection method. Our results also suggest that when EDE are available, both tubal and uterine embryo transfer can be considered. When only LDE are available, however, tubal transfer should be the preferred transfer route.