Pilot study for the neonatal screening of fragile X syndrome

• Published in: Prenatal diagnosis 2002-06, Vol.22 (6), p.459-462
• Main Authors: Rifé, M., Mallolas, J., Badenas, C., Tazón, B., Miguélez, M. Rodríguez, Pàmpols, T., Sànchez, A., Milà, M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Chromosome fragility (bloom syndrome, ataxia telangiectasia, fanconi anemia, x-linked mental retardation...); FMR1 gene; FMRP; Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein; fragile X syndrome; Fragile X Syndrome - diagnosis; Fragile X Syndrome - genetics; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Infant, Newborn; Male; Medical genetics; Medical sciences; neonatal screening; Neonatal Screening - methods; Nerve Tissue Proteins - analysis; Nerve Tissue Proteins - genetics; Pilot Projects; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid; RNA-Binding Proteins
• ISSN: 0197-3851; 1097-0223
• DOI: 10.1002/pd.346

An Erratum has been published for this article in Prenatal Diagnosis 23 (9), 2003, 771. Fragile X syndrome (SFX) is the commonest form of inherited mental retardation. Due to the highly variable phenotype clinical diagnosis is complicated. In nearly all cases, the disorder is caused by expansion of a CGG‐repeat in the 5′‐untranslated region of the FMR1 (fragile X mental retardation‐1) gene. We have evaluated the feasibility, efficiency and costs of two methodologies in order to develop a simple test to screen large populations: PCR and fragile X mental retardation‐1 protein (FMRP) immunodetection. We studied 100 newborn males using PCR and immunodetection (26.91 Euro). All but one amplified the CGG repeat of the FMR1 gene within the normal size range. The sample that failed to amplify showed only 28% of FMRP expression by immunodetection study; both results indicated an affected male. A further 100 males were studied only by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (7.8 Euro); all of them amplified within the normal size range. Both methodologies, PCR and immunodetection, are feasible for screening large populations, PCR being the most suitable, economical and less time‐consuming. However, it is advisable to keep slides for immunodetection when PCR fails or the external control shows no amplification. Early detection of SFX‐affected individuals would represent a great benefit for their maximum social integration, due to appropriate treatment and early stimulation and would permit a cascade screening in their pedigree. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.