Loading…

Clinical Predictors in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients with Computer-Assisted Quantitative Videoendoscopic Upper Airway Analysis

Aim: To identify the clinical predictors and assist surgeons in their clinical management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A prospective study with a new approach to analyze the static and dynamic upper airway morphology between patients with OSA and normal subjects. Method: Quantitative computer‐a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope 2004-05, Vol.114 (5), p.791-799
Main Authors: Hsu, Pon Poh, Tan, Barrie Yau Boon, Chan, Yiong Huak, Tay, Hin Ngan, Lu, Peter Kok Sun, Blair, Robin L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim: To identify the clinical predictors and assist surgeons in their clinical management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A prospective study with a new approach to analyze the static and dynamic upper airway morphology between patients with OSA and normal subjects. Method: Quantitative computer‐assisted videoendoscopy (validated with upper airway magnetic resonance imaging) was performed in 49 (43 males, 6 females) patients with OSA and compared with 39 (22 males, 17 females) controls (apneahypopnea index [AHI] < 5). Absolute cross‐sectional areas and transverse and longitudinal diameters at the retropalatal and retrolingual levels were measured during end of quiet respiration and during Mueller's maneuver in the erect and supine positions, allowing us to study static and dynamic morphology (collapsibility) of the upper airway. Three thousand seven hundred forty‐four (3,744) parameters were analyzed. Results: In males, retropalatal and retrolingual areas during Mueller's maneuver in the supine position of 0.7981 cm2 (relative operating characteristics [ROC] = 0.9284, positive pressure ventilation [PPV] = 86.05%, negative pressure ventilation [NPV] = 84.62%) and 2.0648 cm2 (ROC = 0.8183, PPV = 76%, NPV = 83.33%), respectively, were found to be good predictors/cut‐off values for OSA. The retropalatal area measured in the supine position (AS1 mol/L) and collapsibility of the retropalatal area in the supine position (CAS1) were found to have significant correlations with severity of OSA. In females, the areas measured during Mueller's maneuver in the supine position of 0.522 cm2 at the retropalatal level (ROC = 1, 100% PPV and NPV) and the transverse diameter at the retrolingual level during erect Mueller's maneuver of 1.1843 cm (ROC = 0.9056, PPV = 100%, NPV = 83.33%) were found to be predictive. All measurements at the retropalatal level and in the supine position had higher predictability. Area measurements obtained during Muller's maneuver were more predictive (ROC > 0.9910) than resting measurements (ROC >0.8371). Several sex and anatomic‐site specific formulas with excellent predictability (ROC close or equal to 1) were also devised. Conclusion: Upper airway Mueller's studies are predictive and useful (independent samples t test/Mann‐Whitney U test, ROC) in identifying patients with OSA. With these sex and anatomic‐site specific OSA predictors/formulas and this innovative clinical method, we hope to assist other surgeons with quantitative clinical dia
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1097/00005537-200405000-00001