Loading…

Contractility of single human dermal myofibroblasts and fibroblasts

Human dermal myofibroblasts, characterised by the expression of α‐smooth muscle actin, are part of the granulation tissue and implicated in the generation of contractile forces during normal wound healing and pathological contractures. We have compared the contractile properties of single human derm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cell motility and the cytoskeleton 2002-06, Vol.52 (2), p.82-90
Main Authors: Wrobel, Louise K., Fray, Tim R., Molloy, Justin E., Adams, Julian J., Armitage, Mark P., Sparrow, John C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Human dermal myofibroblasts, characterised by the expression of α‐smooth muscle actin, are part of the granulation tissue and implicated in the generation of contractile forces during normal wound healing and pathological contractures. We have compared the contractile properties of single human dermal fibroblasts and human dermal myofibroblasts by culturing them on flexible silicone elastomers. The flexibility of the silicone substratum permits the contractile forces exerted by the cells to be measured [Fray et al., 1998: Tissue Eng. 4:273–283], without changing their expression of α‐smooth muscle actin. The mean contractile force produced by myofibroblasts (2.2 μN per cell) was not significantly different from that generated by fibroblasts (2.0 μN per cell) when cultured on a substrata with a low elastomer stiffness. Forces produced by fibroblasts were unaffected by increases in elastomer stiffness, but forces measured for myofibroblasts increased to a mean value of 4.1 μN/cell. This was associated with a higher proportion of myofibroblasts being able to produce wrinkles on elastomers of high stiffness compared to fibroblasts. We discuss the force measurements at the single cell level, for both fibroblast and myofibroblasts, in relation to the proposed role of myofibroblasts in wound healing and pathological contractures. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 52:82–90, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0886-1544
1097-0169
DOI:10.1002/cm.10034