Loading…
A comparison between single- and double-breath vital capacity inhalation induction with 8% sevoflurane in children
Summary Background : This study was conducted to determine if a double‐breath (DB) vital capacity (VC) rapid inhalation induction using immediate high‐inspired concentration of sevoflurane is as well tolerated as a single‐breath (SB) technique and if it results in a shorter induction time. Methods :...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric anesthesia 2004-06, Vol.14 (6), p.457-461 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary
Background : This study was conducted to determine if a double‐breath (DB) vital capacity (VC) rapid inhalation induction using immediate high‐inspired concentration of sevoflurane is as well tolerated as a single‐breath (SB) technique and if it results in a shorter induction time.
Methods : A total of 104 children, ASA I‐II, 6 year and above, undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: SB VC inhalation induction or DB VC inhalation induction with 8% sevoflurane in 66% nitrous oxide. The induction time, complications (cough, laryngospasm, breath‐hold, movement, salivation) and level of satisfaction were documented.
Results : Induction was significantly faster in the DB group (41 ± 9 s) compared with the SB group (50 ± 14 s). DB inhalation induction was associated with fewer complications (15.4%) than the SB technique (50%).
Conclusions : Double‐breath VC inhalation induction with 8% sevoflurane is as well tolerated as a SB technique and results in a faster onset of anaesthesia. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1155-5645 1460-9592 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01237.x |