Loading…

A comparison between single- and double-breath vital capacity inhalation induction with 8% sevoflurane in children

Summary Background : This study was conducted to determine if a double‐breath (DB) vital capacity (VC) rapid inhalation induction using immediate high‐inspired concentration of sevoflurane is as well tolerated as a single‐breath (SB) technique and if it results in a shorter induction time. Methods :...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric anesthesia 2004-06, Vol.14 (6), p.457-461
Main Authors: Ho, Kok-Yuen, Chua, Wee-Leng, Lim, Serene ST, Agnes, SB NG
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background : This study was conducted to determine if a double‐breath (DB) vital capacity (VC) rapid inhalation induction using immediate high‐inspired concentration of sevoflurane is as well tolerated as a single‐breath (SB) technique and if it results in a shorter induction time. Methods : A total of 104 children, ASA I‐II, 6 year and above, undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: SB VC inhalation induction or DB VC inhalation induction with 8% sevoflurane in 66% nitrous oxide. The induction time, complications (cough, laryngospasm, breath‐hold, movement, salivation) and level of satisfaction were documented. Results : Induction was significantly faster in the DB group (41 ± 9 s) compared with the SB group (50 ± 14 s). DB inhalation induction was associated with fewer complications (15.4%) than the SB technique (50%). Conclusions : Double‐breath VC inhalation induction with 8% sevoflurane is as well tolerated as a SB technique and results in a faster onset of anaesthesia.
ISSN:1155-5645
1460-9592
DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01237.x