Loading…

The effect of the disc support system on biaxial tensile strength of a glass ionomer cement

Objective: This was to examine how varying the type of support, from a complete ring to a series of point supports, affected the biaxial tensile strength of one glass ionomer cement. Method: Three support diameters from 11.5 to 28.6 mm were achieved using 3 mm ball bearings as point supports equidis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dental materials 2002-07, Vol.18 (5), p.376-379
Main Authors: Williams, Jill A., Billington, Richard W., Pearson, Gavin J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: This was to examine how varying the type of support, from a complete ring to a series of point supports, affected the biaxial tensile strength of one glass ionomer cement. Method: Three support diameters from 11.5 to 28.6 mm were achieved using 3 mm ball bearings as point supports equidistantly spaced around the diameter. From 3–30 point supports were used depending on diameter. At the maximum number of point supports for each diameter the support points were 3 mm apart. After 24 h storage in water at 37°C the biaxial tensile strength of 1 mm thick glass ionomer restorative cement discs was measured using a loading rate of 1 mm min −1. The load at break was converted to biaxial tensile strength using the Timoschenko and Woinowsky-Kreiger equation using a Poisson's ratio value of 0.30. The mean strength of six specimens tested per support regime was calculated. Results: Comparison with the mean result obtained from using a continuous knife-edge support showed there to be no significant difference (unpaired t-test) between the different support systems except in two cases, both being when a four-point support was used. Neither the support diameter nor the number of point supports was crucial. Significance: Results from studies where different systems have been used to support brittle cement discs may be compared.
ISSN:0109-5641
1879-0097
DOI:10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00053-7