Loading…

Hospital primary cesarean delivery rates and the risk of poor neonatal outcomes

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether risk-adjusted hospital primary cesarean delivery rates are associated with poor neonatal outcomes. Study Design: The Washington State Birth Events Records for 1995 and 1996 were used. Predicted primary cesarean delivery rates were calcula...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2002-09, Vol.187 (3), p.721-727
Main Authors: Bailit, Jennifer L., Garrett, Joanne M., Miller, William C., McMahon, Michael J., Cefalo, Robert C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether risk-adjusted hospital primary cesarean delivery rates are associated with poor neonatal outcomes. Study Design: The Washington State Birth Events Records for 1995 and 1996 were used. Predicted primary cesarean delivery rates were calculated for each hospital. Women were divided by whether the hospital had an actual primary cesarean delivery rate below, within, or greater than the predicted CI. Asphyxia (a lack of oxygen that leads to organ damage) was used as a marker of poor neonatal outcome. Risk of neonatal asphyxia was compared for each of the 3 cesarean rating groups. Results: The risk for asphyxia among infants who were born to women who delivered at hospitals that had more, within, or fewer cesarean deliveries than predicted were 0.58%, 0.17%, and 0.33%, respectively (P
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1067/mob.2002.125886