Loading…

Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of hospitalized patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis

The aim of present study was to investigate whether there was any delay in the diagnosis and treatment of inpatients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis followed-up in our centre. We reviewed clinical records in February 1999 and identified 134 hospitalized patients with smear-positive pulmon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Respiratory medicine 2001-10, Vol.95 (10), p.802-805
Main Authors: YILMAZ, A., BOĞA, S., SULU, E., DURUCU, M., YILMAZ, D., BARAN, A., POLUMAN, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of present study was to investigate whether there was any delay in the diagnosis and treatment of inpatients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis followed-up in our centre. We reviewed clinical records in February 1999 and identified 134 hospitalized patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. Clinical files of the patients were analysed and a questionnaire was completed. Several intervals and delays were calculated. Median application interval was 17·5 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 21·3–32·4 days], median referral interval was 3·5 days (95% CI 6·8–11·4 days), median diagnosis interval was 3 days (95% CI 3·3–4·5 days) and median initiation of treatment interval was 1 day (95% CI 1·1–1·6 days). Patient's delay was present in 28·4% of cases. The referral interval was longer than 2 days in 82 patients (institutional delay). Ninety-three patients (69·4%) had delays in the diagnosis and 34 patients (25·4%) had delays in the treatment. There was a doctor's delay in 119 of 134 patients (88·8%) and clinic's delay in 98 patients (73·2%). Our results have suggested that hospitalized patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis experience several delays. These delays may result in increased risk for transmission of infection. Decrease in the risk of infection for community and medical personal may only be obtained by preventing these delays.
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1053/rmed.2001.1156