Loading…
Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of hospitalized patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis
The aim of present study was to investigate whether there was any delay in the diagnosis and treatment of inpatients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis followed-up in our centre. We reviewed clinical records in February 1999 and identified 134 hospitalized patients with smear-positive pulmon...
Saved in:
Published in: | Respiratory medicine 2001-10, Vol.95 (10), p.802-805 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The aim of present study was to investigate whether there was any delay in the diagnosis and treatment of inpatients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis followed-up in our centre. We reviewed clinical records in February 1999 and identified 134 hospitalized patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. Clinical files of the patients were analysed and a questionnaire was completed. Several intervals and delays were calculated. Median application interval was 17·5 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 21·3–32·4 days], median referral interval was 3·5 days (95% CI 6·8–11·4 days), median diagnosis interval was 3 days (95% CI 3·3–4·5 days) and median initiation of treatment interval was 1 day (95% CI 1·1–1·6 days). Patient's delay was present in 28·4% of cases. The referral interval was longer than 2 days in 82 patients (institutional delay). Ninety-three patients (69·4%) had delays in the diagnosis and 34 patients (25·4%) had delays in the treatment. There was a doctor's delay in 119 of 134 patients (88·8%) and clinic's delay in 98 patients (73·2%). Our results have suggested that hospitalized patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis experience several delays. These delays may result in increased risk for transmission of infection. Decrease in the risk of infection for community and medical personal may only be obtained by preventing these delays. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0954-6111 1532-3064 |
DOI: | 10.1053/rmed.2001.1156 |