Long-term outcome after treatment of aortic graft infection with staged extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal

• Published in: Journal of vascular surgery 2000-09, Vol.32 (3), p.451-461
• Main Authors: Seeger, James M., Pretus, Henry A., Welborn, M.Burress, Ozaki, C.Keith, Flynn, Timothy C., Huber, Thomas S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery; Aortic Diseases - surgery; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - surgery; Axillary Artery - surgery; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods; Device Removal; Femoral Artery - surgery; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Iliac Artery - surgery; Middle Aged; Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery; Reoperation
• ISSN: 0741-5214; 1097-6809
• DOI: 10.1067/mva.2000.109471

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine long-term outcome in patients with infected prosthetic aortic grafts who were treated with extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal. Methods: Between January 1989 and July 1999, 36 patients were treated for aortic graft infection with extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal. Extra-anatomic bypass graft types were axillofemoral femoral (5), axillofemoral (26; bilateral in 20), axillopopliteal (3; bilateral in 1) and axillofemoral/axillopopliteal (2). The mean follow-up was 32.3 ± 4.8 months. Results: Four patients (11%) died in the postoperative period, and two patients died during follow-up as a direct consequence of extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal (one died 7 months after extra-anatomic bypass graft failure, one died 36 months after aortic stump disruption). One additional patient died 72 months after failure of a subsequent aortic reconstruction, so that the overall treatment-related mortality was 19%, whereas overall survival by means of life table analysis was 56% at 5 years. No amputations were required in the postoperative period, but four patients (11%) required amputation during follow-up. Twelve patients (35%) had extra-anatomic bypass graft failure during follow-up, and six patients underwent secondary aortic reconstruction (thoracobifemoral [2], iliofemoral [2], femorofemoral [2]). However, with the exclusion of patients undergoing axillopopliteal grafts (primary patency 0% at 7 months), only seven patients (25%) had extra-anatomic bypass graft failure, and only two patients required amputation (one after extra-anatomic bypass graft removal for infection, one after failure of a secondary aortic reconstruction). Furthermore, primary and secondary patency rates by means of life table analysis were 75% and 100% at 41 months for axillofemoral femoral grafts and 64% and 100% at 60 months for axillofemoral grafts. Only one patient required extra-anatomic bypass graft removal for recurrent infection, and only one late aortic stump disruption occurred. Conclusions: Staged extra-anatomic bypass grafting (with axillofemoral bypass graft) and aortic graft removal for treatment of aortic graft infection are associated with acceptable early and long-term outcomes and should remain a primary approach in selected patients with this grave problem. (J Vasc Surg 2000;32:451-61.)