Loading…

Relationship between evaluation by quantitative fatty acid myocardial scintigraphy and response to β-blockade therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Predicting the effect of beta-blockade therapy on the clinical outcome of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is difficult prior to the initiation of therapy. Myocardial fatty acid metabolism has been shown to be impaired in patients with DCM. We examined whether the extent of myocardial inju...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of nuclear medicine 2001-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1811-1816
Main Authors: ITO, Tatsuo, HOSHIDA, Shiro, NISHINO, Masami, AOI, Toshiyuki, EGAMI, Yasuyuki, TAKEDA, Toshihiro, KAWABATA, Masayoshi, TANOUCHI, Jun, YAMADA, Yoshio, KAMADA, Takenobu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Predicting the effect of beta-blockade therapy on the clinical outcome of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is difficult prior to the initiation of therapy. Myocardial fatty acid metabolism has been shown to be impaired in patients with DCM. We examined whether the extent of myocardial injury, as assessed by iodine-123 15-( p-iodophenyl)-3- R, S-methylpentadecanoic acid (BMIPP) myocardial scintigraphy, is related to the response of patients with DCM to beta-blockade therapy. Thirty-seven patients with DCM were examined using BMIPP myocardial scintigraphy before and after 6 months of treatment with metoprolol. Myocardial BMIPP uptake (%BM uptake) was estimated quantitatively as a percentage of the total injected count ratio. The left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions (LVDd, LVDs) and ejection fraction (LVEF) were also evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups according to their functional improvement (>10% elevation of LVEF) after 6 months of metoprolol therapy. Twenty-eight patients responded to the therapy, while nine did not. Prior to the therapy, no significant differences in LVDd, LVDs or LVEF were observed between the responders and non-responders. However, the %BM uptake was significantly lower in the non-responders than in the responders (1.0%+/-0.2% vs 2.1%+/-0.5%, P
ISSN:0340-6997
1619-7070
1619-7089
DOI:10.1007/s00259-001-0668-2