How Can We Identify the Best Implantation Site for an ECG Event Recorder?

• Published in: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2000-10, Vol.23 (10), p.1545-1549
• Main Authors: ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN, HIMMRICH, EWALD, NEBELING, DIRK, PRZIBILLE, OLIVER, NOWAK, BERND, LIEBRICH, ANDREAS
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Electrocardiography - instrumentation; Electrodes, Implanted; Female; Humans; implantable ECG event recorder; Male; Middle Aged; new diagnostic tool; Prosthesis Implantation; unexplained syncope
• ISSN: 0147-8389; 1540-8159
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.01545.x

ZELLERHOFF, C., et al.: How Can We Identify the Best Implantation Site for an ECG Event Recorder? The aim of this study was to show how to find the preferable implantation site for an ECG event recorder (ECG‐ER). We compared the quality of bipolar ECG recordings (4‐cm electrode distance, vertical position) in 65 patients at the following sites: left and right subclavicular, left and right anterior axillary line (4th‐5th interspace), left and right of the sternum (4th‐5th interspace), heart apex, and subxyphoidal. The results were compared to the standard ECG lead II. In 30 patients, an additional comparison between vertical and horizontal ECG registrations was done using the same sites. ECG signals in five patients were compared positioning the electrodes towards the skin with turning them towards the muscle during ECG‐ER implantation. The best ECG quality (defined as highest QRS amplitude, best visible P wave and/or pacemaker spike, best measurable QRS duration, and QT interval) and best agreement with the standard lead II was found in 68% on the left of the sternum, significantly less often (P < 0.001) on the right of the sternum (14.1%), left subclavicular (6.9%), apical (5.5%) and subxyphoidal (4.2%). A significantly higher QRS amplitude was measured and the P wave was more often visible in the vertical electrode position than in the horizontal position. In all five ECG‐ER patients, there was a good agreement between the bipolar surface ECG at the implantation site and ECG‐ER stored signals. A significant noise signal occurred in all five patients when the ECG‐ER was implanted with electrodes towards the muscle. A P wave was visible in only three of those patients, but there was an insignificantly higher QRS amplitude than in ECG‐ERs implanted with electrodes towards the skin. From these results, it can be concluded that the best implantation site for an ECG‐ER is right or left of the sternum, positioning the electrodes vertically and towards the skin.