Loading…
Protein Extraction from Heat-Stabilized Defatted Rice Bran. 1. Physical Processing and Enzyme Treatments
Physical processing with or without enzyme treatments on protein extraction from heat-stabilized defatted rice bran (HDRB) was evaluated. Freeze−thaw, sonication, high-speed blending, and high-pressure methods extracted 12%, 15%, 16%, and 11% protein, respectively. Sonication (0−100%, 750 W), follow...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2002-12, Vol.50 (25), p.7444-7448 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Physical processing with or without enzyme treatments on protein extraction from heat-stabilized defatted rice bran (HDRB) was evaluated. Freeze−thaw, sonication, high-speed blending, and high-pressure methods extracted 12%, 15%, 16%, and 11% protein, respectively. Sonication (0−100%, 750 W), followed by amylase and combined amylase and protease treatments, extracted 25.6−33.9% and 54.0−57.8% protein, respectively. Blending followed by amylase and protease treatment extracted 5.0% more protein than the nonblended enzymatic treatments. High-pressure treatments, 0−800 MPa, with water or amylase−protease combinations, extracted 10.5−11.1% or 61.8−66.6% protein, respectively. These results suggest that physical processing in combination with enzyme treatments can be effective in extracting protein from HDRB. Keywords: Rice bran; protein extraction; physical process; enzyme |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-8561 1520-5118 |
DOI: | 10.1021/jf025771w |