Loading…
Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in Research and Clinical Populations
A study examined the validity of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) with 119 children (ages 3-10) with strict DSM-IV (Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV) diagnoses of autism. The GARS consistently underestimated the likelihood that children would be classified as having autism....
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2002-12, Vol.32 (6), p.593-599 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A study examined the validity of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) with 119 children (ages 3-10) with strict DSM-IV (Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV) diagnoses of autism. The GARS consistently underestimated the likelihood that children would be classified as having autism. Limitations of ratings scales and of the GARS specifically are discussed. (Contains references.) (Author/CR) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0162-3257 1573-3432 |
DOI: | 10.1023/A:1021211232023 |