Loading…
Contributions of mass spectrometry in the study of nucleic acid-binding proteins and of nucleic acid-protein interactions
I. Introduction 306 II. Supramolecular Structure Characterization 308 A. A Protein Is Used as a “Hook” 309 1. Immuno‐Precipitation 309 2. Tagging with a Poly‐Histidine Sequence 310 3. Direct Analysis of Large Protein Complexes 311 4. Tandem Affinity Purification Tag Procedure 312 B. A Nu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mass spectrometry reviews 2002-09, Vol.21 (5), p.305-348 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | I.
Introduction
306
II.
Supramolecular Structure Characterization
308
A. A Protein Is Used as a “Hook”
309
1. Immuno‐Precipitation
309
2. Tagging with a Poly‐Histidine Sequence
310
3. Direct Analysis of Large Protein Complexes
311
4. Tandem Affinity Purification Tag Procedure
312
B. A Nucleic Acid Is Used as a “Hook” or as a “Tracking Label”
314
1. Purification of a Nucleic Acid–Protein Complex in Solution
316
2. Preparative Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
317
3. Surface‐Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization
317
4. Surface Plasmon Resonance
319
5. Probing Nucleic Acid–Protein Interactions on Membranes
320
III.
Supramolecular Analysis in the Gas Phase
321
IV.
Molecular Structure Characterization
324
A. Determination of the Assembly Topology
324
1. Non Site‐Directed Cross‐Links
326
2. Native‐State Chemistry
330
3. Site‐Directed Cross‐Links
332
B. Regulation of the Complex's Structure and Function
334
1. Protein Phosphorylation
334
2. Modification of the Basic Residues
336
3. Oxidoreduction Balance‐Related Modifications
337
V.
Concluding Remarks
339
A. Factual Contributions
339
B. Perspectives
340
Acknowledgments
341
Abbreviations
341
References
341
Nucleic acid–protein (NA–P) interactions play essential roles in a variety of biological processes—gene expression regulation, DNA repair, chromatin structure regulation, transcription regulation, RNA processing, and translation—to cite only a few. Such biological processes involve a broad spectrum of NA–P interactions as well as protein–protein (P–P) interactions. These interactions are dynamic, in terms of the chemical composition of the complexes involved and in terms of their mere existence, which may be restricted to a given cell‐cycle phase. In this review, the contributions of mass spectrometry (MS) to the deciphering of these intricate networked interactions are described along with the numerous applications in which it has proven useful. Such applications include, for example, the identification of the partners involved in NA–P or P–P complexes, the identification of post‐translational modifications that (may) regulate such complexes' activities, or even the precise molecular mapping of the interaction sites in the NA–P complex. From a biological standpoint, we felt that it was worth the reader's time to be as informative as possible about the functional significance of the analytical methods reviewed herein. From a technical standpoint, because mass spectr |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0277-7037 1098-2787 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mas.10036 |